MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416944079 · doi:10.1080/13660691.2025.2586404

Women and Preaching in Premodern Europe: Part Two, The Thirteenth to Sixteenth Centuries

2025· article· en· W4416944079 on OpenAlexafffund
Carolyn Muessig

Bibliographic record

VenueMedieval Sermon Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsNarrativePeriod (music)Postal serviceMiddle Ages

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moving from Women and Preaching in Premodern Europe: Part One The Early Middle Ages to the Twelfth Century, this article extends the study of women’s preaching into the thirteenth to sixteenth centuries, a period marked by both heightened restriction and creative adaptation. While scholastic authorities such as Thomas Aquinas and Henry of Ghent articulated negative theological arguments against women as public teachers, counter arguments and lived practice reveal a more complex reality. The figure of Mary Magdalene provided a scriptural and imaginative model for female preaching. Case studies of Angela of Foligno, Catherine of Siena, Ursula Haider, and others illustrate how women engaged in visionary, exegetical, and performative preaching across Europe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.623

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedieval Sermon StudiesSame topicEarly Modern Women WritersFrench-language works237,207