MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416949011 · doi:10.4000/159px

La régénération urbaine dans les politiques de l'UE et la réutilisation du patrimoine industriel

2025· article· W4416949011 on OpenAlexaff
Massimo Preite

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Phaïstos · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsCanadian Heritage
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUrban environmentTown planningMetropolitan areaUrban sociologyUrban regeneration

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'un des défis majeurs auxquels l'Union européenne a été confrontée a été la désindustrialisation des années 70 et 80 et la dégradation urbaine qui a suivi. Le FEDER a été l’instrument principal pour promouvoir des programmes de régénération urbaine dans les villes affectées par le déclin industriel. À travers l’analyse d’un certain nombre de projets de revitalisation urbaine sélectionnés en fonction de leur capacité à refléter les thématiques propres aux différents cycles de programmation des Fonds structurels, l’article essaye d’évaluer la contribution de la réutilisation du patrimoine industriel aux plans de régénération des villes européennes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-PhaïstosSame topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207