MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of Climate Change on Agriculture and Countermeasures

2025· article· W4416951889 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied and Computational Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicClimate change impacts on agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimate changeAgricultureSustainabilityPolitical economy of climate changeFood securityDiversification (marketing strategy)Agricultural diversificationAgricultural productivityFood systems

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The impact of climate change globally, particularly on the agriculture sector, is becoming harder to ignore. Changes to the means of food production due to climate change may risk the wellbeing of crops and livestock, jeopardize the sustainability of certain farming practices, and threaten food production in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. While some of the literature documents these challenges, the unique contribution of this essay is to document the diverse and multifactor challenges posed by climate change on food production. Such an analysis, based on peer-reviewed literature, must consider the crop and livestock responses to climate change, the challenges posed by declining the quality of water and soil, and the socioeconomic impacts on farmers. Such an analysis must also address the proposed and implemented adaptive and mitigative measures on climate change, including crop diversification and the adoption of water and soil conservation practices of agroecology, and the advocated policy measures. By addressing these issues, this essay hopes to demonstrate the complementary role of scientific research and local practices, policy, and climate agriculture. Knowing the relationship between climate and agriculture is necessary to achieve the goals of food sustainability, development, and environmental resilience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.577

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied and Computational EngineeringSame topicClimate change impacts on agricultureFrench-language works237,207