MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Synthesizing Ultrasound B-mode Images from Subsampled RF Data: A Data-Driven Deep Learning Approach <sup>*</sup>

2025· article· en· W4416960832 on OpenAlexafffund
Nasrin Sheibani-Asl, Sogand Zamanikhah, Gregory J. Czarnota, Ali Sadeghi‐Naini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound Imaging and Elastography
Canadian institutionsSunnybrook Health Science CentreYork University
FundersTerry Fox FoundationLotte and John Hecht Memorial Foundation
KeywordsScannerConvolutional neural networkRadio frequencyData setFrame (networking)Deep learningImage processingIterative reconstructionImage quality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound, a widely used and safe imaging modality, utilizes radio frequency (RF) signals obtained from pulse-echo imaging to generate B-mode images, offering a visual representation of internal body organs and tissue microstructures. The processing details and the specific parameters applied for converting RF data to B-mode images in ultrasound devices are typically not made available by manufacturers. In this study, we investigated a convolutional network architecture for conversion of RF data into two different types of B-mode images generated by the Ultrasonix scanners. Additionally, we assessed the network's efficacy in translating subsampled RF data with fewer scan lines into the B-mode images, aiming to expedite the data acquisition and transmission process. Our results on an unseen test set demonstrate the feasibility of reconstructing B-mode images from full and subsampled RF frames with a quality similar to the scanner-generated B-mode images, even when these images undergo multiple nonlinear processing steps. The proposed approach for B-mode image reconstruction from subsampled RF frames permits scanning wider lateral field of view with the same frame rate, offering increased imaging efficiency while maintaining comparable image quality. In addition, it provides a practical solution for reconstructing high-quality B-mode images from engineered RF data in research settings, where scanner processing details are unavailable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyFrench-language works237,207