MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Non-Intrusive Sleep Staging with Integration of Ballistocardiography and Audio Signals

2025· article· en· W4416960937 on OpenAlexafffund
Dominic J. Jaworski, Edward J. Park

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessPolysomnographySleep (system call)BallistocardiographySleep StagesSleep disorderSleep studyHeartbeat

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the use of audio analysis alongside non-intrusive sensors to measure cardiorespiratory parameters for sleep stage classification. A ballistocardiogram (BCG) detected cardiorespiratory signals through vibrations on the mattress, while an Apple Watch Ultra 2 used optical sensors on the wrist for measurement. The cardiorespiratory signals were processed with non-linear methods and autocorrelation functions to create a dataset from the entire system, which was then trained in a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to classify sleep stages. The output was validated using a polysomnography (PSG) system, showing an agreement of 81% for REM and non-REM sleep stages. Good results were also obtained with audio and BCG, with approximately 76% sleep stage agreement, demonstrating a fully non-contact environment viable for sleep detection. Furthermore, incorporating audio features proved effective in evaluating sleep stages with a non-intrusive setup, ensuring minimum disturbance to participants' natural sleep cycle.Clinical Relevance-Evaluating sleep quality is an inconvenient process for patients due to the extensive setup and discomfort of a clinical PSG system. A more convenient, minimal contact system that effectively assesses sleep quality without disrupting the patient's natural sleep could provide clinicians with measurements that better reflect real-world sleep patterns. This would enable more accurate diagnoses of sleep disorders without inducing symptoms associated with the intensive clinical study experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207