MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Dual-Module Vision-Based Framework for Close-Proximity Real-Time Fall Detection

2025· article· en· W4416961298 on OpenAlexaff
Anas Mahdi, Zonghao Dong, Yue Hu, Yasuhisa Hirata, Katja Mombaur

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersJapan Science and Technology AgencyJapan Society for the Promotion of Science
KeywordsDiscriminative modelKinematicsFeature (linguistics)Classifier (UML)SAFERFeature extractionSupport vector machineRobotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Falls pose a serious threat to older adults' independence and well-being, with sit-to-stand (STS) transition frequently associated with fall incidents. To address this challenge, we propose a real-time fall detection integrated into a mobile assistive robot SkyWalker. Our approach utilizes a depth camera with onboard processing capabilities positioned at close proximity (approximately 0.5 m). A 3D skeletal model derived from MediaPipe tracks the user's motion in real-time, extracting 14 key kinematic features that capture biomechanical information. These features serve as input to a dual-modular classification framework based on support vector machines (SVMs): one classifier predicts STS phases (sitting, rising, switching, standing). while the other identifies irregular motions indicative of falls. By focusing on this reduced yet discriminative feature set, our system remains both computationally efficient and robust to skeleton distortions often encountered at close range. We evaluated our approach using separate datasets for phase classification and fall detection, achieving high accuracy in real-time classification. Future work will extend the system to enable proactive fall prevention strategies, ensuring safer STS transitions for older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.372
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBalance, Gait, and Falls Prevention→French-language works237,207→