MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Signal Quality Estimation of Impedance Pneumography Signals in the NICU Using a Frequency-based Approach *

2025· article· en· W4416961759 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel Radeschi, Eva Sénéchal, Wissam Shalish, Guilherme SantʼAnna, Robert E. Kearney

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNon-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWirelessSIGNAL (programming language)Electrical impedanceRespiratory ratePhotoplethysmogramStandard deviationHeart rateVital signs

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a standard of care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), infants' vital signs are monitored continuously via wired devices. These often interfere with skin-to-skin contact, patient care, and pose increased risks of skin damage, infection, and tangling around the body. We designed an ongoing study to evaluate the feasibility, accuracy, and safety of wireless vital sign monitoring in the NICU. Vital signs were simultaneously acquired using the wired, standard of care bedside monitor and a novel, wireless, wearable sensor (ANNE Arc). Data from 25 NICU infants were recorded for 8 hours a day, over 4 consecutive days. Previously, we found strong accuracy for wireless heart rate (HR) monitoring, but poor performance for respiratory rate (RR). However, RR measurements derived from impedance pneumography can be erroneous in the presence of movement artifacts and increased noise. Thus, we developed an algorithm to continuously estimate the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) across wired and wireless impedance recordings, using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT). Across 72 recording sessions, we found the impedance signal from the wireless sensor had a lower SNR (median SNR of -1.83 dB [IQR: -5.83-1.92]), than the wired reference device (median SNR of 2.12 dB [IQR: -2.14-6.33]). We examined the mean absolute error (MAE) and margin of error (MoE) between paired wired and wireless RR values as a function of the SNR of both systems. The agreement between the wireless and wired RR signals increased during periods of high SNR. The MAE achieved ≤ 10 bpm when wired SNR was ≥ 4 dB and wireless SNR was ≥ 10 dB; for the same SNRs, the MoE ≤±25 bpm. Thus, we showed that the SNR of raw impedance measurements could be used to assess the reliability of RR values displayed on clinical patient monitors.Clinical relevance- This algorithm provides a means of quantifying the signal quality of thoracic impedance measurements acquired from neonates, and assigning confidence to RR values displayed on clinical monitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.481

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringFrench-language works237,207