MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Multi-Loop State-Plane Control of DAB Converters

2025· article· W4416964498 on OpenAlexaff
Matteo Sposito, Ignacio Galiano Zurbriggen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalvanic isolationConvertersControl theory (sociology)TransformerInductorTransient responsePower controlMinificationCurrent transformer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DAB converters are widely used in bidirectional DC-DC power conversion due to their galvanic isolation and high power density. Traditional linear control strategies often struggle with slow transient responses and increased transformer stress. This paper introduces a novel Multi-Loop State-Plane control (MLSPC) approach that leverages a large-signal state-plane model to achieve fast output current regulation and while simultaneously mitigating DC bias on the transformer side. The proposed control method dynamically calculates the optimal output trajectory to control the current and adjusts inner phase-shifts once the power changes, ensuring rapid transient output response and minimizing RMS transformer current. The algorithm maintains the inductor current balance within two switching cycles, preventing transformer core saturation and efficiency losses. The effectiveness of the proposed control is validated through simulation and experimental results, using a scaled-down DAB converter. The controller features fast dynamic response, minimization of DC bias current in the transformer, and an implementation compatible with low-cost microcontrollers, offering a promising solution for efficient and reliable power conversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced DC-DC Converters→French-language works237,207→