MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Best practices for tracing the palate in ultrasound images

2025· article· en· W4416964941 on OpenAlexaff
Hana Ben Asker, Eija Aalto, Lucie Ménard, Walcir Cardoso, Catherine Laporte

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia UniversityÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTracingReproducibilitySwallowingTongueMotion (physics)Task (project management)UltrasoundPosition (finance)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound (US) imaging is a powerful tool for visualizing the vocal tract and tongue motion during speech articulation. A key aspect of analyzing tongue motion is accurately tracing the palate's contour in US images, as it provides a fixed anatomical reference for measuring tongue position and deformation. However, accurately tracing the palate in US images remains challenging due to limited visibility caused by the air gap between the palate and the tongue. To address this limitation, we evaluate the reproducibility of manual palate tracing using methods that rely on varying levels of assistance from image-enhancement algorithms. One of these methods is the cumulative echo skeleton (CES), which enhances video frames to stack and reconstruct palate echoes. These methods are tested across different swallowing tasks. Results indicate that CES-based methods enhance rater agreement, primarily due to the cumulation of echoes. Among the tasks, dry swallow consistently yields higher agreement across methods. Additionally, the CES-based automatic method was benchmarked against manual annotations, showing promising accuracy in dry swallow with a mean sum of distances of 2.63 mm. These findings emphasize the important role of method and task selection in enhancing reproducibility and highlight the potential of automated approaches for palate tracing in US imaging.Clinical relevance- In Speech-Language Pathology (SLP), the application of real-time US imaging can be used in diagnostics and treatment of Speech Sound Disorders (SSD). Furthermore, it facilitates observations of oral movements like swallowing and mastication. The incorporation of a static image of the palate-an anatomical structure that is both familiar and tangible within the oral cavity-provides a valuable reference point for interpreting the dynamic movements of the tongue. This visual aid enhances the understanding of real-time ultrasound images, benefiting both the clinician and the client.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.121
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.121
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0110.005
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0050.005
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.507
Teacher spread0.412 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207