MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416965676 · doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2025.3639583

Cache-Enabled XR Systems: Delay-Aware Resource Allocation for Immersive Experience

2025· article· en· W4416965676 on OpenAlexaff
Krishnendu S. Tharakan, Hayssam Dahrouj, Nour Kouzayha, Hesham ElSawy, Tareq Y. Al-Naffouri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImage and Video Quality Assessment
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersKing Abdullah University of Science and Technology
KeywordsCacheMobile edge computingKnapsack problemBase stationRendering (computer graphics)Quality of experienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionResource allocationOptimization problemRedundancy (engineering)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Extended Reality (XR) applications offer immersive experiences across industrial, healthcare, educational, and entertainment sectors, but they demand ultra-low latency and high data rates that challenge current cellular infrastructure. This paper proposes a latency-aware mobile XR system comprising multi-antenna base stations (BSs) and edge servers, each equipped with limited fronthaul capacity and local caching. To minimize end-to-end latency, we develop a unified optimization framework that jointly addresses field of view (FOV) caching and rendering, BS selection, beamforming vector design, and edge server placement. The framework captures the inter-dependencies between user-specific FOVs, rendering decisions, and resource constraints such as computation capacity and power, ultimately enhancing the quality of personal experience (QoPE). We formulate the problem as a mixed-integer non-convex program and solve it using ℓ0-norm relaxation, successive convex approximation, and fractional programming. Reformulating it as a multiple choice multiple dimensional knapsack problem (MMKP), we apply Lagrangian dual decomposition to derive efficient solutions. Simulation results demonstrate that our approach significantly outperforms baseline algorithms. Notably, a 91% reduction in average delay is achieved when varying BS cache size, and a 94% improvement is observed over the greedy-edge method when adjusting edge server cache size. These results highlight the potential of the proposed method for scalable, delay-aware XR systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.938
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0100.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Open Journal of the Communications SocietySame topicImage and Video Quality AssessmentFrench-language works237,207