MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416969343 · doi:10.2196/78309

Unsupervised Characterization of Temporal Dataset Shifts as an Early Indicator of AI Performance Variations: Evaluation Study Using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV Dataset

2025· article· en· W4416969343 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
David Fernández-Narro, Pablo Ferri, Alba Gutiérrez‐Sacristán, Juan M. García‐Gómez, Carlos Sáez

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Medical Informatics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining setClinical PracticeCharacterization (materials science)Health informaticsChange detection

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Reusing long-term data from electronic health records is essential for training reliable and effective health artificial intelligence (AI). However, intrinsic changes in health data distributions over time-known as dataset shifts, which include concept, covariate, and prior shifts-can compromise model performance, leading to model obsolescence and inaccurate decisions. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigate whether unsupervised, model-agnostic characterization of temporal dataset shifts using data distribution analyses through Information Geometric Temporal (IGT) projections is an early indicator of potential AI performance variations before model development. METHODS: Using the real-world Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) electronic health record database, encompassing data from over 40,000 patients from 2008 to 2019, we characterized its inherent dataset shift patterns through an unsupervised approach using IGT projections and data temporal heatmaps. We trained and evaluated annually a set of random forests and gradient boosting models to predict in-hospital mortality. To assess the impact of shifts on model performance, we checked the association between the temporal clusters found in both IGT projections and the intertime embedding of model performances using the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate a significant relationship between the unsupervised temporal shift patterns, specifically covariate and concept shifts, identified using the IGT projection method and the performance of the random forest and gradient boosting models (P<.05). We identified 2 primary temporal clusters that correspond to the periods before and after ICD-10 (International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) implementation. The transition from ICD-9 (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision) to ICD-10 was a major source of dataset shift, associated with a performance degradation. CONCLUSIONS: Unsupervised, model-agnostic characterization of temporal shifts via IGT projections can serve as a proactive monitoring tool to anticipate performance shifts in clinical AI models. By incorporating early shift detection into the development pipeline, we can enhance decision-making during the training and maintenance of these models. This approach paves the way for more robust, trustworthy, and self-adapting AI systems in health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.449
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Medical InformaticsSame topicHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringFrench-language works237,207