Addled by antlers: Synchronous disruption to female caribou antler phenology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Caribou are the only deer species in which females also grow antlers; however, female antler phenology differs from males. While males grow antlers over summer and hold them through autumn rut, female caribou grow antlers in summer and carry the polished antlers through winter until parturition. The pathways associated with antler casting in females are thought to be related to hormonal changes during parturition. Yet not every female caribou is pregnant every year, and nonpregnant individuals must use an alternative cue to trigger antler casting. While populations are typically consistent in antler phenology there are observations of individual caribou on an alternate phenological timeline, casting antlers 1 month prior to parturition, and growing velvety antlers a few inches long during the calving time. Indeed, this is generally observed in barren females and only in small proportions of the population. Here we report on observations of a population‐wide change in antler phenology on Fogo Island, Newfoundland. We observed several individuals growing velvety antlers during calving season, earlier than in previous years, including two individuals who were confirmed to have been pregnant. Additionally, we observed no female caribou with polished antlers from the previous autumn, when our field observations generally show ~20% of the adult female caribou in this population have antlers at this time. We discuss possible disruptions to this phenology, commenting specifically on environmental cues that differed in comparison to years with the more commonly observed phenology. We found evidence suggesting that years with early antler casting had earlier spring warming, as well as earlier reduction in snow cover when compared to previous years. Our observations suggest that changing climate patterns may impact antler growth in female caribou, causing growth to coincide with the increased nutritional and energetic demands associated with gestation and lactation. Specifically, it is possible that earlier warming patterns may change which cue triggers antler growth in pregnant individuals from a hormonal cue during pregnancy to an environmental cue more commonly used by barren individuals. We highlight potential research questions surrounding the resilience of antler phenology, and the potential fitness consequences of disruptions to antler growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".