MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416978498 · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2025.123115

Dissipation and heat-transfer management in high-voltage heating elements

2025· article· en· W4416978498 on OpenAlexafffund
Javier López, Reghan J. Hill

Bibliographic record

VenueChemical Engineering Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsJoule heatingNatural convectionHeating elementConvectionHeat transferJoule effectHeat transfer coefficientElectric heatingThermalDissipation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global transition toward renewable energies has brought special interest in electrified industrial heating systems, including thermal energy storage systems. While extensive research has been undertaken to design electrical heaters—focusing on macro-scale analyses, no research has addressed in a computationally efficient manner the micro-scale design of electrical heating elements to maximize power, and to avoid dielectric breakdown and heating-wire melting. This research addresses the micro-scale Joule heating and heat-transfer problem, furnishing a design rationale to inform macro-scale design of electrical heating elements under any voltage and external heat-transfer resistance. The model is used to interpret a recent literature report of an electrical heating element in air. From measured surface temperatures and the power dissipation, we ascertain the natural convection heat transfer coefficient and the internal temperature distribution, unveiling how close the heating wire comes to melting. The natural convection heat transfer coefficient for ambient air under non-Oberbeck-Boussinesq conditions is found to be significantly enhanced. By drawing on dimensional and geometric simlitude, the model may be translated to other thermal-fluid systems to optimize in-the-field performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.595
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemical Engineering ScienceSame topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207