Upaya Konseling Individu dalam Mendukung Pemulihan Korban Pelecehan Seksual
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kasus pelecehan seksual di Indonesia terus mengalami peningkatan, termasuk di Kabupaten Gresik yang banyak melibatkan korban remaja perempuan. Pelecehan seksual tidak hanya menimbulkan dampak fisik, tetapi juga gangguan psikologis seperti kecemasan, depresi, dan stres, sehingga korban membutuhkan pendampingan yang tepat untuk memulihkan kondisi emosionalnya. Artikel ini membahas pelaksanaan konseling individu berbasis daring bagi korban pelecehan seksual di Biro ASCA Elpida. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus dengan asesmen awal menggunakan DASS-42, kemudian dilanjutkan tiga sesi konseling yang berfokus pada eksplorasi emosi, restrukturisasi kognitif, dan penguatan mekanisme koping. Hasil menunjukkan penurunan gejala kecemasan dan stres, serta peningkatan kemampuan klien dalam mengenali, mengekspresikan, dan mengelola emosinya. Klien juga menunjukkan perkembangan dalam membangun kembali rasa percaya diri dan keterlibatan sosial. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa konseling daring dapat menjadi alternatif pendampingan psikologis yang efektif, fleksibel, dan ramah korban.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".