En lille skat fra Fæsted Toft/A small hoard from Fæsted Toft
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fæsted og Harreby har i snart et årti budt på talrige spændende opdagelser, som knytter sig til en magtfuld elite og den førkristne religions udøvelse, lige fra bronzealder til vikingetid. Men en fundtype har manglet; nemlig de karakteristiske skattefund fra ældre germansk jernalder. Hidtil har fraværet afspejlet det faktum, at fundstedets sydvestjyske region ifølge Lotte Hedeagers doktorafhandling ikke har været kendetegnet ved en tilstedeværelse af denne type depot (Hedeager 1990, 67-72, fig. 50-62). Dette er imidlertid ikke længere tilfældet, for et detektorfund og to mindre udgravninger ved Fæsted Toft har løftet sløret for et spændende lille formodet ædelmetaldepot, som må anses som usædvanligt på mere end én måde. Dette fund er emnet for nærværende artikel, hvor vi vil berette om skatten, dens kontekst blandt fortidsminder og i et sakralt landskab samt placere den i lyset af samtidens øvrige, lignende deponeringer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".