MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416986932 · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64608-3

Considerations and perspectives on phage therapy from the transatlantic taskforce on antimicrobial resistance

2025· article· en· W4416986932 on OpenAlexaff
Kyung D. Moon, Carmen Coxon, Christine Årdal, Radu Botgros, Sarah Djebara, Laura Durno, Cara R. Fiore, J Perrin, Dennis M. Dixon, Marco Cavaleri

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntibiotic resistancePhage therapyTask forceAntimicrobialBacteriophageTask (project management)Resistance (ecology)Perspective (graphical)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amid rising antimicrobial resistance and limited antibiotic innovation, bacteriophages are gaining attention as potential therapeutics across human health, animal, and food sectors. Despite historical use, their clinical application in humans remains constrained by scientific, industrial, and regulatory challenges. To address these issues, the Transatlantic Task Force on Antimicrobial Resistance (TATFAR) convened sessions with experts from member parties. This perspective synthesizes insights from the TATFAR group, highlighting regulatory differences, research gaps, and opportunities for international collaborations to advance bacteriophage therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.048
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.255

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0480.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0100.010
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0210.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature CommunicationsSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207