MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416987700 · doi:10.1016/j.lanplh.2025.101397

Reframing the climate anxiety focus ahead of COP30: the imperative of addressing the policy-action gap

2025· article· en· W4416987700 on OpenAlexaff
Nathanael Ip, Ana Paula Guillen Yangali, Leslie Collao Bazan, Satara Uthayakumaran, Bisma Qamar, Karin-Annika Luga, Carmelo Aquilina, Georg Poensgen, Veronika Novotná, Nico Pampier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet Planetary Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicClimate Change Communication and Perception
Canadian institutionsGovernment of AlbertaGovernment of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive reframingFocus (optics)AnxietyFocus groupClimate change

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In November, 2025, government and experts will meet in Brazil for the 30th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP30). In preparation, WHO and the Brazilian Government jointly convened the Fifth Global Conference on Climate and Health in July, 2025. The resulting Belém Health Action Plan for the Adaptation of the Health Sector to Climate Change is multifaceted and includes core climate–health targets: equity, justice, and capacity building.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.551
GPT teacher head0.524
Teacher spread0.028 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Lancet Planetary HealthSame topicClimate Change Communication and PerceptionFrench-language works237,207