MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416988082 · doi:10.1038/s44183-025-00155-0

Reply to: “Comment to ‘Rethinking maritime security from the bottom up: four principles to broaden perspectives and centre humans and ecosystems’”

2025· article· en· W4416988082 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Fabinyi, Christopher Cvitanovic, Kate Barclay, Nathan Bennett, Edward Sing Yue Chan, Hanh Nguyen, Stefan Partelow, Annie Young Song, Natasha Stacey, Dirk J. Steenbergen, Bianca Suarez, Maria Tanyag

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Ocean Sustainability · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMaritime Security and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaFisheries and Oceans Canada
FundersRheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität BonnYonsei UniversityCharles Darwin UniversityUniversity of WollongongUniversity of New South WalesACT Government
KeywordsMaritime securityGovernment (linguistics)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We thank Okafor-Yarwood et al. for their response to our paper on “Rethinking maritime security from the bottom up”, for bringing African perspectives to the fore, and for highlighting the importance of inclusive authorship and citation practices. We also extend our gratitude to npj Ocean Sustainability for enabling an academic space where we can have a dialogue on epistemic justice in relation to maritime security—a rarity in our current moment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.633
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Ocean SustainabilitySame topicMaritime Security and HistoryFrench-language works237,207