Bibliographic record
Abstract
Essayiste phare du Québec des années 1960 à 2000, Pierre Vadeboncœur (1920-2010) s’est illustré dans l’écriture moraliste, avec un ton personnel, intuitif et méditatif, un style plus artistique que démonstratif, des formes littéraires en spirale ou en fragments. Penseur sans système de pensée préconçu et esthète sans préjugés esthétiques, cet écrivain revendiquait aussi une liberté spirituelle entre la croyance et l’incroyance. Lorsque les circonstances l’amenaient à écrire sur la politique ou le syndicalisme, sa plume-scalpel, sa formidable capacité de synthèse et son sens de la formule choc faisaient de lui un excellent analyste et un redoutable commentateur. Les colères, polémiques et plaidoyers de Vadeboncœur éclairent plusieurs enjeux de notre époque. Ses essais intimistes sur l’art, l’amour, l’enfance et la spiritualité n’ont pas vieilli et touchent à l’universel. Pierre Vadeboncœur, le compagnon de route , synthèse accessible, invite le lectorat de la francophonie à (re)plonger dans une œuvre d’une troublante actualité.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".