Potential Nucleotide Sites for RNA Glycosylation: acp3U and Beyond
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The emerging field of glycoRNAs, RNA molecules covalently modified with glycans, challenges the long-held belief that glycosylation is exclusive to proteins and lipids. The discovery of 3-(3-amino-3-carboxypropyl) uridine (acp3U) as a specific N-glycan attachment site has been a major breakthrough, establishing glycoRNA as a structurally defined and functionally relevant biopolymer. This new function of acp3U suggests its crucial regulatory node that correlates translation with other cellular processes, such as immune modulation and cell signaling. The presence of glycoRNAs on the cell surface and their interaction with immune receptors imply their involvement in cell-to-cell communication. Furthermore, studies have begun to associate altered glycoRNA patterns with conditions like cancer and inflammation, opening up possibilities for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Despite the rapid progress in this field, several key challenges remain, including the inherent bias of current detection methods, the difficulty of isolating pure glycoRNA samples from complex cellular mixtures, and the largely unknown mechanisms of specific glycan linkages. Future research must focus on developing unbiased and sensitive analytical technologies to accurately map these modification patterns at a single-nucleotide resolution. This review summarizes the chemical and enzymatic mechanisms of RNA glycosylation sites, highlights its potential functional roles in cells, and outlines future research aimed at uncovering its full biological and therapeutic potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".