MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416992957 · doi:10.1038/s44304-026-00204-9

Storylines of summer streamflow droughts in western Canadian watersheds: historical attribution and future projections

2025· article· en· W4416992957 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Rajesh R. Shrestha, Alex J. Cannon

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj natural hazards. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsStreamflowClimate changeCounterfactual thinkingSnowSnowmeltClimate modelGlobal warmingMediterranean climate

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Abstract</title> Southern British Columbia, Canada experienced successive summer streamflow droughts in 2023 and 2024, with flows approximately 23%–43% below the 1955–2024 means and substantial impacts on water and energy supplies. Here, we characterize these events in a storyline framework by driving a large-scale hydrological model with meteorological forcings from factual, counterfactual and future climates. The results showed that the 2023 drought was primarily driven by anomalously high May–June temperatures, whereas the 2024 drought was primarily caused by an exceptionally low snowpack. Long-term climate change has reduced summer flows by approximately 8%–31% and intensified the severity of both droughts. Future projections suggest increased frequency and severity of summer streamflow droughts, with events exceeding the historically extreme 2023 drought becoming more common, and the compounding effects of meteorological and snow droughts becoming more prevalent. Overall, these results underscore the need to enhance resiliency to summer streamflow droughts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.447
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj natural hazards.Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207