MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416994077 · doi:10.1128/jcm.01452-25

Toxigenic diphtheria rarely detected amid rising cases of nontoxigenic <i>Corynebacterium diphtheriae</i> infections in Ontario, Canada, 2011–2023

2025· article· en· W4416994077 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lisa R. McTaggart, Alexandra Scione, Kelty Hillier, Elizabeth M. Brown, Sarah E. Wilson, Julianne V. Kus

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and Tetanus
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoPublic Health Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiphtheriaPublic healthVaccinationEpidemiologyImmunizationPenicillin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Diphtheria remains a major public health threat in areas of the world where diphtheria toxoid-containing vaccine programs are not successfully implemented or maintained. In countries with high vaccine coverage, diphtheria is well-controlled with occasional travel-related cases eliciting a robust public health response to limit transmission. While classic diphtheria is caused by toxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae and rarely by other species, such as Corynebacterium ulcerans , infections due to nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae (not covered by the vaccine) are increasingly being reported. We describe the genomic epidemiology of toxigenic and nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae in Ontario, Canada, based on isolates submitted to the Public Health Ontario Laboratory. Of 146 cases, four cases (2.7%) involved toxigenic C. diphtheriae , three of which were associated with travel from endemic countries. Most isolates were nontoxigenic (97.2%) and from cutaneous sources (84.9%), with an increase in submission of nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae isolates from one in 2016 to 65 in 2023. Based on whole-genome sequencing and BIGSdb-Pasteur core genome multi-locus strain typing, most nontoxigenic isolates were categorized into three highly related genetic clusters from sublineages 32 and 76, suggesting epidemiologically linked cases indicative of local transmission. Apart from intermediate susceptibility to penicillin in 98.0% of isolates, antimicrobial resistance was rarely detected. Because infections with nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae are not prevented by vaccination and do not cause classic diphtheria, healthcare professionals should be aware of these trends, given the clinical, public health, and infection control implications when C. diphtheriae is identified in the microbiology laboratory prior to knowledge of toxigenicity. IMPORTANCE Infections by toxigenic and nontoxigenic Corynebacterium diphtheriae cause vastly different diseases requiring different treatment and public health responses. Healthcare practitioners should be aware of the complexities of diphtheria from a global perspective. Toxigenic C. diphtheriae remains prevalent in regions that do not have well-established vaccination programs, while vaccine hesitancy and compliance issues challenge countries that do require childhood vaccination. These factors, coupled with the propensity for human travel and migration, heighten the risk of cases and outbreaks in non-endemic countries and designate diphtheria as a relevant re-emerging threat. Further complicating public health decisions is the increasing incidence of nontoxigenic C. diphtheriae infections identified among highly vaccinated populations. An excessive public health response in these cases would be burdensome and expensive. Our findings will aid public health departments and hospitals with local risk assessments of the likelihood that a laboratory identification of C. diphtheriae represents a case of toxigenic diphtheria by raising awareness of the disproportionately small number of toxigenic C. diphtheriae recovered from clinical specimens compared to the vast majority of nontoxigenic isolates. Genomic analysis suggests local transmission of nontoxigenic strains, while isolation of toxigenic C. diphtheriae from among a highly vaccinated population remains associated with travel to endemic regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and TetanusFrench-language works237,207