MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416997254 · doi:10.3390/ai6120315

Optimizing Urban Travel Time Using Genetic Algorithms for Intelligent Transportation Systems

2025· article· en· W4416997254 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAI · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic control and management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeightingTraffic congestionGenetic algorithmMicrosimulationLatency (audio)Software deploymentSet (abstract data type)Routing (electronic design automation)Fuel efficiency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Urban congestion causes further increases in travel times, fuel consumption and greenhouse-gas emissions. In this regard, we conduct a systematic study of a Genetic Algorithm (GA) for real-time routing in an urban scenario in Bethlehem City, based on a SUMO microsimulation that has been calibrated using real data from the field. Our work makes four main contributions: (i) the implementation of a reproducible GA framework for dynamic routing with explicit constraints and adaptive termination criterion; (ii) design of a weight sensitivity study for studying a multi term fitness function with travel time and waiting time, and optionally fuel usage; (iii) an edge-assisted distributed architecture on roadside units (RSUs) supported by cloud services; and (iv) specifying and refining the data set description and experimental protocol with a planned statistical analysis. Empirical evidence from the Bethlehem case study shows a consistent decline in total travel time under high congestion cases. Variations in the waiting time between different scenarios are exhibited, reflecting the trade-offs in the fitness weighting scheme. We recognize that we have some limitations, including the manual resolution of data and the inherent problem of differences between simulations and real world, and we are proposing a road-map towards a pilot deployment that handles these issues. Rather than proposing a new GA variant, we present a deployment-oriented framework-an edge- assisted GA with explicit protocols and a latency envelope, and a reproducible multi-objective tuning procedure validated on a city-scale network under severe congestion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it