An Effective Approach to Geometric and Semantic BIM/GIS Data Integration for Urban Digital Twin
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urban Digital Twins (UDTs) demand both simplified geometry and rich semantic information from Building Information Models (BIM) to be effectively integrated into Geospatial Information Systems (GIS). However, current BIM-to-GIS conversion methods struggle with geometric complexity and semantic loss, particularly at scale. This paper proposes a novel, scalable methodology for comprehensive BIM/GIS integration, addressing both geometric and semantic challenges. The approach introduces a geometry conversion workflow that transforms solid BIMs into valid, simplified CityGML representations through a level-by-level detection of building elements and outer surface extraction. To preserve semantic richness, all entities, attributes, and relationships—including implicit connections—are automatically extracted and stored in a Labeled Property Graph (LPG) database. The method is further extended with a new CityGML Application Domain Extension (ADE) that supports Multi-LoD4 representations, enabling selective interior visualization and efficient rendering. A web-based urban digital twin platform demonstrates the integration, allowing dynamic semantic querying and scalable 3D visualization. Results show a significant reduction in geometric complexity, full semantic retention, and robust performance in visualization and querying, offering a practical pathway for advanced UDT development.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it