MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4416998650 · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2025.101109

Adherence to the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines is related to a lower risk of all-cause mortality: A prospective cohort study of 14,288 participants from the SUN Project

2025· article· en· W4416998650 on OpenAlexaff
José Francisco López-Gil, Mark S. Tremblay, Maira Bes‐Rastrollo, Laura Moreno‐Galarraga, Stefanos N. Kales, Miguel Ángel Martínez‐González, Alejandro Fernández‐Montero

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProspective cohort studyMovement (music)PopulationCohort studyPhysical activityLower risk

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the associations between adherence to the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines and all-cause and cause-specific mortality in a large Spanish prospective cohort. METHODS: We analyzed data from 14,288 participants of the Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) Project, followed for a mean of 12.8 years (mean baseline age = 38.3 years; 60.1% women). Data were collected at baseline and through biennial follow-up questionnaires (up to 10 waves, depending on year of entry). The participants self-reported 24-h movement behaviors at baseline and were categorized based on the number of guidelines met (0-3). Behaviors were assessed at baseline only; changes in adherence during follow-up were not accounted for. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause and cause-specific mortality, adjusting for sociodemographic, lifestyle, and clinical covariates. RESULTS: Meeting a greater number of 24-Hour Movement Guidelines at baseline was associated with a progressively lower risk of all-cause mortality. Compared with those meeting none, the multivariable-adjusted HRs were 0.52 (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.33-0.82) for meeting 1 guideline, 0.47 (95%CI: 0.30-0.73) for meeting 2 guidelines, and 0.44 (95%CI: 0.28-0.71) for meeting all 3 guidelines. Only adherence to the physical activity guidelines was independently associated with a significantly lower mortality risk (HR = 0.70; 95%CI: 0.55-0.89). A reduced risk was also observed for cancer and other-cause mortality among those meeting 2 or more guidelines. CONCLUSION: Adherence to the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines at baseline, particularly physical activity, was associated with a lower risk of mortality. Promoting an integrated approach to movement behaviors may be an effective strategy for improving population health and longevity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.032
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.478
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health ScienceSame topicPhysical Activity and HealthFrench-language works237,207