MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417000825 · doi:10.1145/3763326

AnySplat: Feed-forward 3D Gaussian Splatting from Unconstrained Views

2025· article· en· W4417000825 on OpenAlexaff
Lihan Jiang, Yucheng Mao, Linning Xu, Tao Lu, Kerui Ren, Xudong Xu, Mulin Yu, Jiangmiao Pang, Feng Zhao, Dahua Lin, Bo Dai

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Graphics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntrinsicsRendering (computer graphics)View synthesisGaussianGraphics pipelinePoint cloudDeep neural networks

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce AnySplat, a feed-forward network for novel-view synthesis from uncalibrated image collections. In contrast to traditional neural-rendering pipelines that demand known camera poses and per-scene optimization, or recent feed-forward methods that buckle under the computational weight of dense views—our model predicts everything in one shot. A single forward pass yields a set of 3D Gaussian primitives encoding both scene geometry and appearance, and the corresponding camera intrinsics and extrinsics for each input image. This unified design scales effortlessly to casually captured, multi-view datasets without any pose annotations. In extensive zero-shot evaluations, AnySplat matches the quality of pose-aware baselines in both sparse- and dense-view scenarios while surpassing existing pose-free approaches. Moreover, it greatly reduces rendering latency compared to optimization-based neural fields, bringing real-time novel-view synthesis within reach for unconstrained capture settings. Project page: https://city-super.github.io/anysplat/.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on GraphicsSame topicGenerative Adversarial Networks and Image SynthesisFrench-language works237,207