MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417001062 · doi:10.1136/pn-2025-004936

Aphasic status epilepticus complicating hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state

2025· article· en· W4417001062 on OpenAlexaff
Omar K. Bukhari, Sarah Alqhtani, Laila Alqahtani, Benjamin Whatley

Bibliographic record

VenuePractical Neurology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurological and metabolic disorders
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStatus epilepticusComplicationLevetiracetamEpilepsyDiabetes mellitusMetabolic disorderElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aphasic status epilepticus is a rare neurological complication of the hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state, a severe metabolic emergency in diabetes mellitus. Symptoms include language disturbance without significantly impaired consciousness. The diagnosis is complex, and management of the aphasic status epilepticus involves metabolic correction and antiseizure medications. We describe a 66-year-old man with type 2 diabetes who presented with progressive speech decline and impaired coordination following a fall. EEG confirmed non-convulsive status epilepticus, and MR brain scan showed transient left temporal changes with later hippocampal atrophy. Initial treatment with insulin and levetiracetam led to significant recovery. This case underscores hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic states as a reversible cause of aphasic status epilepticus and highlights the varied neurological presentations of uncontrolled diabetes. We include a review of the literature to contextualise this under-recognised clinical entity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePractical NeurologySame topicNeurological and metabolic disordersFrench-language works237,207