MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417001668 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.02201

Swivuriso: The South African Next Voices Multilingual Speech Dataset

2025· preprint· W4417001668 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Vukosi Marivate, Kayode Olaleye, Sitwala Mundia, Andinda Bakainga, Unarine Netshifhefhe, Mahmooda Milanzie, Tsholofelo Hope Mogale, Thapelo Sindane, Zainab Abdulrasaq, Kesego Mokgosi, Chijioke Okorie, Nia Zion Van Wyk, Graham Morrissey, Dale Dunbar, Tsosheletso Chidi, Rooweither Mabuya, Andiswa Bukula, Respect Mlambo, Tebogo Macucwa, Idris Abdulmumin, and Seani Rananga

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2025
Typepreprint
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech Recognition and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of PretoriaInternational Development Research CentreNvidiaBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsBenchmarkingDomain (mathematical analysis)Baseline (sea)Data collectionSpeech technologyComputational linguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces Swivuriso, a 3000-hour multilingual speech dataset developed as part of the African Next Voices project, to support the development and benchmarking of automatic speech recognition (ASR) technologies in seven South African languages. Covering agriculture, healthcare, and general domain topics, Swivuriso addresses significant gaps in existing ASR datasets. We describe the design principles, ethical considerations, and data collection procedures that guided the dataset creation. We present baseline results of training/finetuning ASR models with this data and compare to other ASR datasets for the langauges concerned.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.102 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicSpeech Recognition and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207