MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417002266 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-4430

Frailty as a prognostic factor in younger adult patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation

2025· article· en· W4417002266 on OpenAlexaff
Sergio Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Nihar Desai, Maria Queralt Salas Gay, Eshrak Al‐Shaibani, Igor Novitzky‐Basso, Arjun Law, Auro Viswabandya, Fotios V. Michelis, Jonas Mattsson, Dennis Kim, Rajat Kumar, Tommy Alfaro Moya

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCumulative incidenceHazard ratioProportional hazards modelHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationMyeloid leukemiaIncidence (geometry)Confidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is potentially curable with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT); however, its curative potential is often limited by treatment-related toxicity. We have previously demonstrated that frailty independently predicts both overall survival (OS) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in all patients undergoing alloHCT. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of frailty in patients under the age of 65 with AML undergoing alloHCT. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 213 patients aged <65 years who underwent alloHCT between 2014 and 2025. The previously validated Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Frailty Scale (HCT-FS) was used, comprising eight domains: Clinical Frailty Score (≥3 vs. not frail), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL; ≥1 limitation vs. no limitation), timed up and go test (TUGT; >10s vs. <10s), grip strength (<16 kg for females and <26 kg for males vs. higher), self-rated health (SRH; fair or poor vs. normal), history of falls in the last 6 months (yes vs. no), serum albumin (<38 g/L vs. >38 g/L), and C-reactive protein (CRP ≥11 mg/L vs. <11 mg/L). Patients were stratified into three groups: fit (≤1), pre-frail (>1 to ≤5.5), and frail (≥5.5). Primary endpoints were NRM and OS. Secondary endpoints included cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and graft-versus-host disease-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS). Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated for OS and RFS, with comparisons via the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards models were used for prognostic analysis, reporting hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For cumulative incidence of CIR and NRM, the Fine-Gray method and Gray’s test were applied considering competing risks. Results The median age of the cohort was 53 years (range 18–64), with 54% (n=115) female. At pre-transplant assessment, 13.2% (n=28/212) had a high/very high disease-risk index, 30.1% (n=63/209) had an HCT-CI ≥3, and 13.4% (n=28/208) had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) <90. Based on the HCT-FS, 33.3% (n=71/213) were classified as fit, 52.1% (n=111) as pre-frail, and 14.6% (n=31) as frail. Fifty-five percent (n=119) received myeloablative conditioning. Donor sources included matched unrelated (61%, n=130), matched sibling (23.9%, n=51), and haploidentical donors (15%, n=32). Most patients (88.7%) received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based GvHD prophylaxis. After a median follow-up of 43.4 months [range 35.7–47.9], the 1- and 2-year NRM for the entire cohort were 13.4% [9.2–18.4] and 15.2% [11.5–21.6], respectively. When stratified by HCT-FS, fit patients had a 1- and 2-year NRM of 2.9% and 4.4%, pre-frail patients 14.0% and 15.1%, and frail patients 35.5% and 46.5% (p<0.001). Compared to fit patients, pre-frail patients had a trend toward higher NRM (HR 2.82 [0.97–8.21], p=0.057), while frail patients had a significantly higher risk (HR 2.36 [1.97–5.73], p<0.001). The 1- and 2-year OS for the full cohort were 79.7% [73.6–84.6] and 70.8% [63.9–76.7], respectively. Fit patients had a 1- and 2-year OS of 91.4% and 86.8%, pre-frail 78.2% and 69.3%, and frail 58.1% and 40.1% (p<0.001). Compared to fit patients, frail patients had a significantly higher risk of death (HR 1.88 [1.36–2.62], p<0.001), while pre-frail patients also had decreased survival though not statistically modelled here. The 1-year CIR for the cohort was 14.5% [10.1–19.7], with no significant differences between fit, pre-frail (p=0.59), or frail (p=0.21) groups. Similarly, the 1- and 2-year RFS were 84% [77.9–88.6] and 73.3% [65.8–79.4], with no significant differences between fit, pre-frail (p=0.36), or frail (p=0.54) patients. The 1- and 2-year GRFS were 53.2% [46.1–59.7] and 41.2% [34.2–48.0]. Fit patients had a GRFS of 59.6% and 51.0%, pre-frail 55.0% and 39.4%, and frail 32.3% and 25.1% (p=0.002). Compared to fit patients, frail patients had a significantly higher risk of inferior GRFS (HR 1.52 [1.17–1.98], p=0.001). Conclusion Frailty was a predictor of both OS and NRM even in young patients with AML undergoing alloHCT. Our results support the growing evidence that physiological reserve may be a more meaningful determinant of transplant fitness than chronologic age alone. Routine use of the HCT-FS could better inform treatment decisions, optimize eligibility criteria, and identify patients who might benefit from prehabilitation or modified conditioning approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→