Una reforma postal integrada. La instalación de la Real Renta de Correos en Nueva España, 1764-1773
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo analiza la instalación de la Renta de Correos en Nueva España entre 1764-1773. Propone que el primer administrador de correos de México, Domingo Antonio López, actuó como un nodo que articuló los elementos estructurales de la renta (la normativa postal y la jurisdicción de correos). Su labor fue decisiva para crear dispositivos legales (bandos y tarifas) que activaron el funcionamiento de las oficinas postales. Asimismo, esta investigación plantea que los administradores de correos fueron, además de coordinadores del giro postal, acuciosos gestores documentales, ya que era necesario controlar el amplio espectro de la correspondencia oficial, además de la privada, para que la renta operara correctamente. Para ello, se refieren las ordenanzas, las instrucciones y las disposiciones que las autoridades imperiales emitieron, pero principalmente se analiza —desde una perspectiva administrativa e institucional— la documentación que la Renta de Correos generó y que se conserva en el Archivo General de la Nación de México. Esta fuente ilustra las estrategias locales que se formularon para aplicar la reforma postal borbónica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".