MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417004848 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-7753

Investigating belumosudil in children with refractory moderate-to-severe chronic graft-versus-host disease: Design of a phase 1/2 study

2025· article· en· W4417004848 on OpenAlexaff
Kirk R. Schultz, Adriana Balduzzi, Marta González‐Vicent, Muna Qayed, Fausto R. Loberiza, Lauren Rota, Cathy Cantalloube, Paul A. Carpenter

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Canadian institutionsBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefractory (planetary science)Clinical trialSystemic therapyHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationDiseaseComplicationAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) is a significant complication in children who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), contributing to long-term morbidity. Belumosudil, a selective rho-associated coiled-coil–containing protein kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in adult cGvHD but pediatric data are lacking. This trial aims to establish the recommended pediatric equivalent dose (RPED) of belumosudil and assess its safety and efficacy in children aged 1 to less than 18 years old. Methods and study design: SchoolROCK is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1/2, single-arm study investigating a daily orally administered liquid formulation of belumosudil in children with moderate-to-severe cGvHD, which is refractory to or has recurred after 2-5 prior lines of systemic therapy. In Phase 1, participants aged 1 to <12 years will receive a belumosudil dose estimated to mimic the exposure observed in adults after the administration of belumosudil 200 mg tablets once daily. After actual RPED is determined, Phase 2 will assess the overall response rate (ORR) by Week 24 in participants aged 1 to <18 years. Treatment will continue until clinically significant disease progression; relapse of the underlying disease; initiation of new systemic therapy for cGvHD; unacceptable toxicity; or study completion. The study also included a 4-week post-treatment safety follow-up, plus long-term follow-up until death or end of study, whichever occur first. Eligibility Criteria: Key inclusion criteria: Age 1 to <18 years; prior allo-HSCT; moderate-to-severe cGvHD requiring systemic therapy as defined by the 2014 National Institutes of Health (NIH) consensus criteria; prior treatment with 2-5 lines of systemic GvHD therapy; Lansky or Karnofsky performance status ≥60; and body weight ≥8 kg. Key exclusion criteria: Progressive underlying disease; prior exposure to belumosudil; severe pulmonary dysfunction (forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤39% or lung score of 3); active, uncontrolled infections; significant organ dysfunction; and current use of restricted medications (e.g., strong CYP3A4 inducers, proton pump inhibitors [PPIs] during Phase 1). Participants with progressive underlying disease or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of belumosudil, active viral hepatitis B and C, history of another malignancy (within 3 years) are excluded. Endpoints:Primary endpoints: RPED determination (Phase 1); ORR by Week 24 (Phase 2)Secondary endpoints: Safety, PK parameters, duration of response, organ-specific response, failure-free survival, overall survival, and time to response Status: The study is in progress. RPED determination in Phase 1 will provide dosing details for Phase 2. Enrollment and follow-ups are also in progress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation→French-language works237,207→