MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417008341 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-7342

Real-world hematologic response and treatment patterns among patients with polycythemia vera (PV) treated with ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ropeg)

2025· article· en· W4417008341 on OpenAlexaff
Malcolm Charles, Zhaohui Su, Kathleen M. Aguilar, Robert J. Reid, Ira Zackon, Stefanie Cribb, Edward Jefford, Paul D. Walden

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsForming Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolycythemia veraHematocritHematologyMedical prescriptionRetrospective cohort studyObservational studyClinical trialMyeloproliferative neoplasmGuideline

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND PV is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by elevated blood counts, especially erythrocytosis, and associated risk of thrombotic events. While cytoreductive therapy, particularly hydroxyurea (HU), has been a mainstay treatment, ropeg has emerged as a promising new treatment approach based on recent trial results, subsequent FDA approval, and inclusion as a NCCN Guideline preferred treatment. Following its pivotal trials, this is the first study that assessed treatment patterns, including first-line (1L) cytoreductive therapy, and outcomes associated with ropeg use based on electronic health records (EHR) in a real-world community setting. METHODS This retrospective observational study leveraged structured data from the iKnowMed EHR, which is used throughout The US Oncology Network and affiliated practices. The study included adult patients diagnosed with PV who were not trial participants, had at least 2 visits between November 1, 2021, and June 30, 2025, and received at least 2 prescriptions for ropeg. Patient demographic, clinical, and treatment characteristics were assessed descriptively. Best hematologic response (bHR) was defined as hematocrit (HCT) <45%, white blood cell (WBC) <10 K/uL, and platelets <400 K/uL, using the lowest observed results within 60 days of each landmark point. Best hematocrit response (HCT <45%) was also captured. Time to next treatment (TTNT) spanned from ropeg initiation to the start of the subsequent non-ropeg regimen. The average biweekly dose was calculated by dividing cumulative dose amounts by the number of syringes dispensed within 60 days of each landmark point. RESULTS Among eligible patients (n=156), 36% initiated ropeg in the 1L setting and 64% as later-line treatment (2L+). The median time from PV diagnosis to ropeg initiation was 18.8 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 2.5, 41.7), with medians of 2.0 and 26.6 months for 1L and 2L+ patients, respectively. Among 2L+ patients, prior therapies included HU (71%), ruxolitinib (25%), peginterferon alfa-2a (6%), and interferon alfa-2b (1%). Therapeutic phlebotomy was administered to 63% of patients at least once prior to ropeg initiation, and to 33% of patients following initiation. The median age at ropeg initiation was 65 years (IQR: 56, 72) with 66% 60 years or older; 54.5% were female, with the racial distribution: 80% White, 6% Black, 5% Asian, and 9% other. Baseline median (IQR) hematologic parameters were WBC 10.7 K/uL (7.3, 16.9), platelets 460 K/uL (298, 674), HCT 44.9% (40.4, 49.1), and estimated glomerular filtration rate 87.7 (63.0, 103.4). The median starting dose for ropeg was 100 mcg. An escalation in average biweekly dose was observed, with medians of 200, 234, 228, 300, and 400 mcg at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. For all patients at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, bHR rates were 30%, 43%, 44%, 53%, and 50%, and best hematocrit response (HCT <45%) was achieved by 70%, 78%, 72%, 76%, and 85% of patients. Patients starting ropeg in 1L had bHR rates of 22%, 38%, 50%, 62%, and 60% compared to 35%, 46%, 40%, 48%, and 44% for patients starting in 2L+. Best hematocrit responses were 64%, 74%, 68%, 77%, and 90% for 1L initiation and 73%, 81%, 74%, 76%, and 81% for 2L or greater. Approximately 60% of patients remained on ropeg at 27 months. Median TTNT was not reached during up to 40 months of follow-up, suggesting sustained disease stability. CONCLUSIONS This real-world study of PV patients treated with 1L and 2L+ ropeg, establishes evidence of dose escalation, as well as bHR and best hematocrit response comparable to that observed in the pivotal trials. These findings support the effectiveness of ropeg in community practice populations and provide benchmarks for future studies. Further research, including abstraction of unstructured data, is warranted to explore more details on dosing, duration of therapy, adverse effects, driver mutations, allele burden declines, and long-term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicMyeloproliferative Neoplasms: Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207