MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417008866 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3582

Phase 3 study (inMIND) of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide and rituximab for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma: Clinical characteristics and outcomes by age

2025· article· en· W4417008866 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Poh, Francisco J. Hernandez‐Ilizaliturri, Marek Trněný, Julie M. Wu, Philomena Colucci, Oscar Bortolami, Laurie H. Sehn

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSpinal Cord Injury BCUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLenalidomideRituximabFollicular lymphomaRefractory (planetary science)PopulationPhases of clinical researchPlaceboPost-hoc analysisNeutropeniaProgression-free survival

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Incidence of follicular lymphoma (FL) increases with age and patients (pts) often relapse, requiring multiple lines of therapy. Tafasitamab (tafa), a humanized CD19-targeting monoclonal antibody (mAb), in combination with lenalidomide (len) + rituximab (R) was recently approved for treatment of adults with relapsed or refractory FL (R/R FL) in the US. At the primary analysis of inMIND (NCT04680052), an international, phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo (pbo)-controlled trial, tafa+len+R demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS in pts with R/R FL with a 57% reduction in the risk of progression or death and a safety profile as expected in the pt population (Sehn LH, et al. Blood. 2024;144[Suppl 2]:LBA1). This post hoc analysis evaluates efficacy and safety in pts enrolled in inMIND by age. Methods Eligible pts were aged ≥18 y with R/R CD19+ and CD20+ FL (grade 1-3A) and ECOG PS ≤2, who had received ≥1 prior systemic therapy including an anti-CD20 mAb. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive tafa 12 mg/kg IV or pbo with standard dosing of len+R for up to 12×28-day cycles. Pts with moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl ≥30 to <60 mL/min) were also eligible and received a reduced starting dose of len at 10 mg daily. Analyses included PFS by investigator (primary endpoint) and safety in pts <65 y and ≥65 y, and in pts <75 y and ≥75 y. Results Overall, 548 pts were randomized to the tafa arm (n=273) or pbo arm (n=275). Of the total pts enrolled in both treatment arms, 50% were <65 y (tafa, n=137; pbo, n=139), 50% were ≥65 y (tafa, n=136; pbo, n=136), 80% were <75 y (tafa, n=219; pbo, n=221), and 20% were ≥75 y (tafa, n=54; pbo, n=54). Baseline characteristics were generally similar between the tafa and pbo arms within age categories; median time since FL diagnosis (<65 y, 4.6 y and ≥65 y, 6.4 y; <75 y, 5.1 y and ≥75 y, 6.7 y) and proportions of pts with FLIPI score ≥3 (<65 y, 40% and ≥65 y, 65%; <75 y, 50% and ≥75 y, 64%) were higher in pts ≥65 y vs <65 y and ≥75 y vs <75 y. Proportions of pts with CrCl 30 to <60 mL/min were 5% and 34% in pts <65 y and ≥65 y and 11% and 52% in pts <75 y and ≥75 y, respectively. For pts <65 y, median investigator-assessed PFS was not reached with addition of tafa vs 12.0 months with pbo (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI] 0.35 [0.22, 0.55]), and for pts ≥65 y was 20.0 months with tafa vs 15.0 months with pbo (HR [95% CI] 0.53 [0.35, 0.80]). Improvements were also observed in pts <75 y and ≥75 y: median investigator-assessed PFS was 23.6 months with addition of tafa vs 14.4 months with pbo (HR [95% CI] 0.44 [0.31, 0.61]) for pts <75 y, and 15.0 months with addition of tafa vs 13.0 months with pbo (HR [95% CI] 0.58 [0.30, 1.12]) in pts ≥75 y. The small number of pts ≥75 y limits interpretation of these data. TEAEs were reported for >98% of pts in the tafa or pbo arm across age subgroups. Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs were reported for 66% of pts <65 y in the tafa arm and 65% of pts in the pbo arm, and for 76% of pts ≥65 y in the tafa arm and 75% of pts in the pbo arm. Serious TEAEs were reported for 34% of pts <65 y in the tafa arm and 30% of pts in the pbo arm, and for 39% of pts ≥65 y in the tafa arm and 34% of pts in the pbo arm. Fatal TEAEs occurred in 1 pt (1%) <65 y in both the tafa and pbo arms and in 5 pts (4%) ≥65 y in both the tafa and pbo arms. Tafa or pbo discontinuations due to TEAEs were recorded for 10% and 6% of pts <65 y, and for 12% and 8% of pts ≥65 y in the tafa and pbo arms, respectively. Grade 3 or 4 TEAEs were reported for 69% and 68% of pts <75 y and for 80% and 74% of pts ≥75 y in the tafa and pbo arms, respectively. Serious TEAEs were reported for 35% of pts <75 y in the tafa arm and 28% of pts in the pbo arm, and for 41% of pts ≥75 y in the tafa arm and 44% of pts in the pbo arm. Fatal TEAEs occurred in 4 pts (2%) and 2 pts (4%) <75 y, and in 3 pts (1%) and 3 pts (6%) ≥75 y in the tafa and pbo arms, respectively. Tafa or pbo discontinuations due to TEAEs were reported for 10% of pts <75 y in the tafa arm and 6% of pts in the pbo arm, and for 17% of pts ≥75 y in the tafa arm and 11% of pts in the pbo arm. Data on tafa and len dose reduction will be presented. Conclusions This analysis confirms that tafa+len+R reduced risk of progression or death measured by PFS irrespective of pt age, including older pts up to 88 y and with moderate renal insufficiency. The safety profile was manageable across older and younger pts with toxicities as expected for the pt population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→