MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417011092 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1091

Development of a prediction model for maternal pregnancy complications in sickle cell disease

2025· article· en· W4417011092 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaron Cheng, Phyllis A. Gimotty, David J. Margolis, Scott A. Peslak, Hanny Al‐Samkari, Andrea H. Roe, Janet L. Kwiatkowski

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPregnancyDiseaseCohortRetrospective cohort studyAnemiaAdvanced maternal ageBlood transfusionClinical trialCohort study

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Pregnant individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD) face dramatically increased maternal risks, with prior work showing over a sevenfold increase in risk of severe maternal morbidity compared to those without SCD. Despite this well-established risk, there is no validated, widely adopted tool to predict whether a pregnancy is most likely to result in maternal complications. There is an urgent need for accurate risk-stratification tools to guide preconception counseling and perinatal care. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of pregnant adults with SCD using two EMR-linked clinical data repositories: the Mass General Brigham (MGB) Research Patient Data Registry (5 affiliated hospitals) and the Penn Data and Analytics Center (3 affiliated hospitals). We identified individuals with ICD-9 or ICD-10 codes for SCD and pregnancy, and performed manual chart review to confirm SCD genotype and annotate clinical variables. We collected baseline labs (e.g., blood counts, hemoglobin quantitation), SCD treatment (e.g., hydroxyurea use, transfusion history), and complications at baseline and during pregnancy. As a benchmark, we applied a previously published prediction model developed at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto (Malinowski et al., 2021). However, the Toronto model was developed using a broader composite outcome that included any transfusion or a single vaso-occlusive episode (VOE), events that may not always prompt a change in clinical management. Given these limitations, we developed a more stringent and clinically focused composite outcome designed to better capture events with direct implications for maternal care. We defined a binary composite outcome variable reflecting severe maternal complications, which include SCD-related complications during pregnancy (e.g., acute chest syndrome [ACS], stroke, hemolytic crisis, urgent red cell exchange, sepsis, intensive care unit admission, or ≥3 VOEs requiring emergency care or hospitalization) and pregnancy-related complications (e.g., preeclampsia and venous thromboembolism). These variables were chosen based on severity, relevance, and potential to prompt changes in clinical management. We then developed a new prediction model using multivariable logistic regression with generalized estimating equations to account for clustering by patient, trained on pregnancies not initiated on prophylactic transfusions during gestation. Predictors include genotype, hemoglobin, number of VOEs in the year prior to pregnancy, history of ACS, history of pulmonary hypertension, and an interaction term between hemoglobin level and VOE frequency. We performed internal validation using 800 bootstrap samples, a standard statistical technique to test the model's stability and assess for overfitting. Results We identified 231 pregnancies in 167 unique patients with genotype-confirmed SCD. Most patients (n=119, 71%) contributed a single pregnancy; others contributed up to four. Genotypes included 103 HbSS, 42 HbSC, 11 HbS/β0-thalassemia, and 11 HbS/β+-thalassemia. Preventive red cell transfusions were initiated in 36 pregnancies (15.6%). A severe maternal complication (defined above in Methods) was experienced in 153 of 231 pregnancies (66.2%). Among pregnancies not started on prophylactic transfusion (n=195), the Toronto model achieved an area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of 0.811 using its original composite outcome. However, when we re-evaluated the Toronto model using our more stringent and clinically actionable composite outcome, its AUC declined to 0.743, indicating substantially reduced discriminative performance. Our revised model achieved an apparent AUC of 0.831 and a calibration slope of 0.908. The optimism-corrected AUC after internal validation was 0.819. These results suggest that our model achieves excellent discriminative performance with minimal overfitting. Conclusion This study represents the largest multi-institutional effort in the United States to develop a prediction model for maternal complications in SCD. Compared to the only previously published model, our model exhibited superior discriminative performance in predicting severe maternal complications. Our model incorporates readily available clinical and hematologic predictors to risk-stratify pregnancies. Ongoing efforts will focus on refining and validating the model with the goal of creating an evidence-based tool to guide the risk-adapted management of pregnant individuals with SCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.041
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207