MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417011262 · doi:10.1093/jscdis/yoag020.023

Etavopivat in Adolescents with Sickle Cell Disease: Emerging Safety and Efficacy Findings from the First Cohort of the Ongoing Phase 1/2 HIBISCUS Kids Study

2025· article· en· W4417011262 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adlette Inati, Bernhards Ogutu, E. Leila Jerome Clay, Pavithra Dhayakar, Kaming Lo, Miguel R. Abboud

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of sickle cell disease. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCohortAnemiaSickle cell anemiaHemoglobinAdverse effectCohort studyHemolysisHemolytic anemiaHemoglobinopathy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Etavopivat is a selective, orally bioavailable, small-molecule activator of the pyruvate kinase red blood cell (RBC) isozyme (PKR), under investigation for the treatment of individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Etavopivat’s multimodal mechanism of action lowers RBC 2,3-diphosphoglycerate (2,3-DPG), enhancing hemoglobin (Hb)-oxygen affinity and elevating Hb levels, while increasing adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to promote RBC health. In the phase 2/3 HIBISCUS study in adults and adolescents with SCD, compared with placebo, the phase 2 part showed that etavopivat reduced annualized vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs) rate at Week (Wk) 52, increased Hb at Wk 24, lowered hemolysis markers and patient-reported fatigue scores, and was relatively well tolerated (Delicou S et al. Blood 2024;144[Suppl 1]:179). HIBISCUS Kids (NCT06198712) is an ongoing, phase 1/2, single-arm, four-cohort, open-label study investigating the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of etavopivat in children and adolescents with SCD (6 months–< 18 years) with study sites in Canada, Kenya, Lebanon, Nigeria, and the UK. Here we report preliminary safety and efficacy findings from the first 15/25 planned participants in cohort 1 (aged 12–< 18 years) who have completed the 24-wk primary treatment period. Methods Participants received open-label study drug etavopivat 400 mg once-daily orally for 24 wks. Each age-based cohort will initiate etavopivat following a 12-wk safety and PK review of the preceding cohort. Participants had a documented SCD genotype, Hb level ≥5.5–< 10.5 g/dL during screening, and severe SCD, defined by ≥ 1 of the following within 12 months of screening: 2–15 documented VOCs; hospitalization for SCD complication; urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (ACR); or normal or conditional transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasonography. Stable dose concurrent therapy with hydroxyurea, crizanlizumab and L-glutamine was permitted. Safety endpoints included serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), etavopivat discontinuations, dosing interruptions, and dose reductions. Laboratory safety markers were assessed. Efficacy endpoints were Hb response (>1 g/dL increase from baseline [BL]) at Wk 24 and change from BL to Wk 24 in Hb, VOC occurrence, hemolysis markers (absolute reticulocyte count [ARC], indirect bilirubin, and lactate dehydrogenase [LDH]), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue scores. Changes in ACR, cerebral blood flow (time-averaged mean of the maximum velocity [TAMMV] by TCD), and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were also assessed. Results 15 adolescent participants (10 female, 10 Black/African American, 13 HbSS and 2 HbSβ0-thalassemia genotype) with a mean age of 14.5 years (range 12–17) received etavopivat 400 mg/day. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) BL Hb was 8.0 g/dL (1.13); all participants completed 24 wks of treatment. One participant required a dose interruption due to a drug-related SAE (cholestasis), which resolved. No deaths were reported. Most TEAEs (101/105 events) were mild or moderate in severity. The most common TEAEs were sickle cell anemia with crisis (9/15), malaria (4/15), headache (4/15), and tonsilitis (4/15). Changes in safety laboratory values over 24 wks were not clinically relevant. Ten participants had an Hb response, with a mean (SD) change in Hb from BL of 1.5 g/dL (0.69) at Wk 2 and 1.4 g/dL (0.99) at Wk 24. Mean (SD) number of VOCs over 24 wks was 1.8 (1.93). PROMIS Fatigue scores decreased: mean (SD) changes from BL to Wk 12 of –4.6 (9.37) and Wk 24 of –2.6 (12.10). Mean (SD) change from BL to Wk 24 in hemolysis markers: –84.5 × 109/L (64.5) for ARC, –28.3 µmol/L (26.3) for indirect bilirubin and –179 U/L (124.2) for LDH. At Wk 24, 4/15 participants showed an improvement in TAMMV as assessed by TCD measurement; one brain MRI scan revealed a non-clinically significant abnormality. Conclusions In this preliminary analysis of the HIBISCUS Kids study, the first to investigate a PKR activator in a pediatric SCD population including children younger than 12 years, etavopivat was relatively well tolerated by adolescents. Cohort 1 enrollment and dosing are complete; weight-based dosing with a granule formulation has begun for cohort 2, children aged 6–< 12 years. The study is expected to provide further insights into the safety, tolerability, and potential clinical benefits of etavopivat in younger children, including those as young as 6 months.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of sickle cell disease.Same topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207