MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417011285 · doi:10.1016/j.catena.2025.109676

Cryosphere and lithology influence the hydrological gradients of high elevation Alpine catchments

2025· article· en· W4417011285 on OpenAlexaff
Stefano Brighenti, Matteo Delpero, Francesca Bearzot, Giulia Bertolotti, Monica Tolotti, Maria Cristina Bruno, Andrea Fischer, Gerfried Winkler, Giulio Voto, Agnese Aguzzoni, Werner Tirler, Francesco Comiti

Bibliographic record

VenueCATENA · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsAlberta EnergyUniversity of Calgary
FundersEuropean Commission
KeywordsMeltwaterTributaryGlacierSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)Drainage basinSnowmeltRock glacierSnow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In high-elevation systems influenced by receding cryosphere, geomorphology and lithology can strongly influence the hydrology of river networks. During summer 2022–2023, we studied the water temperature, δ 18 O, pH, major ions, and trace element concentrations at two headwater catchments in the Eastern Italian Alps. We investigated the main streams at the spring and below the confluences with tributaries from glaciers, intact and relict rock glaciers, young moraines, and till deposits. In the non-glacierized catchment (6.3 km 2 ), water temperature increased from 1.6 °C at the intact rock glacier spring to 7.3 ± 1.5 °C at the catchment outlet, despite the inputs from till and rock glacier springs with <3.0 °C waters. In the glacierized catchment (3.7 km 2 ), the proglacial reaches had a water temperature of 6.9 ± 2.6 °C and the inputs from cold rock glacier springs decreased the water temperatures by 2–4 °C along the stream. Due to predisposing lithology, at the glacierized catchment the concentrations of trace elements such as Ni, Al, Mn, Zn, Y, and Li were high along the entire river network except in till and the relict rock glacier springs, which are not influenced by the cryosphere. For both catchment outlets, end-member mixing models estimated 60–65 % contribution from rock glaciers to stream runoff. In both river systems, meltwater from snow and ice was the dominant runoff component, with rainwater accounting for 20–30 % of runoff in the non-glacierized catchment and for <10 % in the glacierized one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.492

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCATENASame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207