INO-transit: Inotuzumab ozogamicin treatment prior to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in Relapsed/Refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Real-world patient characteristics and outcomes in Spain, the UK and US
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Introduction:Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a CD22-targeted antibody drug conjugate approved for relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). InO has shown promising results as a component of transitioning therapy prior to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) (Kantarjian et al., 2019). However, real-world data on the use and outcomes of InO prior to or as a bridging therapy to CAR-T remain limited (Laetsch et al. 2023; Shah et al. 2021; Lin et al. 2024). The INO-TRANSIT study aimed to describe the real-world demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in R/R B-ALL patients treated with InO prior to CAR-T. Methods:Data were drawn from an observational chart review of patients with R/R B-ALL receiving InO prior to CAR-T from sites in Spain, the UK and the US from December 2024–June 2025. Patients were ≥18 years at index and received InO to facilitate CD19-directed CAR-T (even if CAR-T was not administered). Electronic case report forms captured patient demographics, clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Index was first InO dose (01 June 2017 onwards), with a minimum follow-up of three months post-index. Overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were evaluated via Kaplan-Meier estimations (with 95% CIs). Results:Of the 84 patients analyzed, median (IQR) age was 40.0 (24.0, 59.0) years, 78.6% were White and 57.1% were male. Most patients (73.2%) had relapsed disease, 25.5% were refractory. 20.2% of patients had extramedullary disease at their R/R B-ALL diagnosis. Prior to index, 35.7% of patients received a hematopoietic stem cell transplant, 31.0% received blinatumomab and 4.8% received InO. At index, 14.3% of patients were Philadelphia chromosome (Ph) positive, 6.0% were Ph-like and 25.0% of patients had other cytogenetic abnormalities. Median (IQR) bone marrow blast (BMB) count was 62.5% (18.0%, 89.5%). All patients underwent at least 1 cycle of InO prior to CAR-T, 21.4% received 2 cycles and 3.6% received ≥3 cycles. Most patients (73.8%) received InO as a monotherapy. Overall, 45.3% of patients first received InO prior to apheresis and 54.7% between apheresis and CAR-T infusion. Upon InO completion, 46.5% of patients achieved CR, CR with partial hematologic recovery (CRh) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi). 26.2% of patients were refractory to InO and 9.5% had progressive disease. Of those assessed (n=65), 41.5% tested negative for minimal residual disease (MRD) after their first and 43.1% after their last cycle of InO. Median (IQR) BMB count after last dose of InO was 2.0% (0.0%, 41.0%), and 66.0% patients had BMB <5%. Median (IQR) TTNT was 35.0 (22.0, 57.0) days, inclusive of CAR-T initiation. Leukapheresis was performed successfully on all patients (n=84); 71 (84.5%) received CAR-T infusion, 9 (10.7%) received another therapy and 4 (4.8%) went into palliative care. CAR-T treatment details were available for 64 patients. Of these, 29.7% received tisagenlecleucel, 34.4% received brexucabtagene autoleucel and 35.9% received another CD19-directed CAR-T product. CAR-T was infused as salvage 1 (34.4%), salvage 2 (29.7%) or salvage 3 or later (26.6%). Overall, 76.7% (n=56/73) of patients achieved CR/CRh/CRi after CAR-T or another therapy. A further 6.8% had refractory disease and 6.8% had progressive disease. CR was maintained for 68.8% of patients until six months after CAR-T. After infusion, 35.9% of patients had B-cell recovery. At 12 months after CAR-T infusion, an estimated 72.5% patients survived and 62.4% had not initiated another salvage therapy. Median OS was not reached. Most patients were alive at the time of data collection (57.3%). Of those who died (42.7%), ALL disease progression was responsible in 82.9% of patients while 11.4% died due to ALL treatment-related causes. Veno-occlusive disease (VOD) was diagnosed in 7.1% of patients at any point during their ALL treatment; a further 4.8% had suspected VOD. 46.4% of patients were diagnosed with neutropenic sepsis at any point during their diagnosis and treatment. Conclusions:Most patients who received InO prior to CAR-T successfully received treatment, achieving CR after CAR-T. Leukapheresis after InO treatment was feasible, with meaningful 12-month post-CAR-T OS, and the incidence of VOD at any time was low. While larger, comparative studies are required to determine optimal strategies before CAR-T, this study suggests that InO may be used effectively prior to CAR-T.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".