MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417011724 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-914

Enhanced efficacy of TRAIL or TRAIL-CD28 chimera armored anti-BCMA CAR T cells in multiple myeloma

2025· article· en· W4417011724 on OpenAlexaff
Mansour Poorebrahim, David Jung, Holly Lee, Sacha Benaoudia, Sungwoo Ahn, Noémie Leblay, Sejal Chikhale, Elham Hasheminasabgo, Anja Barbour, Lawrence Boise, Paola Neri, Nizar J. Bahlis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChimeric antigen receptorChimera (genetics)CD28T cellMultiple myelomaImmunotherapyJurkat cellsCell cultureReceptor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: While BCMA-targeted CAR-T cell therapies have shown promising response rates in multiple myeloma (MM), most patients ultimately relapse. Tumoral intrinsic and extrinsic factors contribute to CAR T cell resistance. Amongst CAR T cell-intrinsic limitations, poor expansion and persistence (typically 3–6 months in MM), exhaustion, and loss of early memory phenotypes, are major drivers of treatment failure. Our single-cell transcriptomic profiling of T cells from MM patients with durable remissions post anti-BCMA CAR T therapy identified high expression of the death receptor ligand TNFSF10 (encoding for TRAIL) as well as the T cell costimulatory receptor CD28 in their CAR T cells. Previous report also identified that FADD (FAS associated death domain) or TNFRSF10B (encoding DR5 also know TRAIL-R2) knock-out abrogated anti-CD19 CAR T cell efficacy. Given these observation, we first sought to explorewhether armoring anti-BCMA CAR-T cells with TRAIL or a chimeric TRAIL-CD28 fusion will enhance their cytolytic function, and second to examine whether the TRAIL-CD28 chimera will attenuate any potential fratricide effect induced by TRAIL overexpression. Methods: We engineered third-generation anti-BCMA CAR constructs (scFv-4-1BB-CD3ζ) into the pLX307 lentiviral backbone, with or without co-expression of TRAIL or a chimeric TRAIL-CD28 molecule (TRAIL extracellular/transmembrane domain fused to CD28 intracellular domain). Functional assays were performed in MM cell lines, including teclistamab-resistant and NFκB-activated (TRAF3 CRISPR knockout) MM cell lines that were in vitro derived to acquire BCMA-antigen independent relative resistance to TCE and CAR T cells. Co-cultures were performed under standard and exhaustion-inducing conditions (e.g., high tumor burden; E:T = 1:5 and repeated stimulation). Cytotoxicity, CAR-T cells phenotype, and viability were assessed using flow cytometry. Co-cultures with healthy donor PBMCs and normal bone marrow cells were conducted to evaluate off-tumor toxicity. In vivo functional evaluations of these TRAIL engineered CAR were performed in NSG mice that were systemically injected OPM2 TRAF3KO cells (stably transduced with firefly luciferase). Results: We first evaluated the of role of the death receptors axis and granzymes in mediating anti-BCMA CAR T cells cytolytic activity. To this extent KMS12BM myeloma cell lines were engineered to KO FADD or TRAIL-R2 (DR5) or overexpress Cowpox virus protein CrmA to inhibit caspase 8 downstream of death receptors or overexpress the granzyme B inhibitor Serpin B9. Co-culture studies of these cell lines with anti-BCMA CAR T unarmored or TRAIL-armored cells confirmed the significant contribution of TRAIL to CAR T cell activity since death receptor blockade (in FADD- or TRAIL-R2 KO cells) and similar to granzyme B inhibition, significantly attenuated MM cell death. Consistent with these observations, TRAIL-armored anti-BCMA CAR-T cells exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity against a library of MM cell lines including cells with lower TRAIL-R1/TRAIL-R2 expression. This enhanced activity of the TRAIL armored CAR was also particularly evident under stress conditions such as chronic stimulation and low E:T ratios. This effect extended to teclistamab-resistant and NFκB-activated MM cell lines models where unarmored CAR-T cells showed limited efficacy. Importantly, no cytotoxicity of the TRAIL-armored CAR was observed against healthy PBMCs or bone marrow–resident cells, consistent with their low or absent TRAIL-R1/TRAIL-R2 expression. As anticipated, TRAIL overexpression induced mild CAR T cells fratricide (< 10%) however only at high CAR-T cell culture densities. This fratricide effect was substantially abrogated in anti-BCMA CARs transduced with the TRAIL-CD28 chimera, which also provided CD28-mediated pro-survival signals. TRAIL-CD28–armored CAR-T cells maintained robust BCLxL expression and a favorable phenotypes with enriched naïve and central memory cells. Lastly, the in vivo NSG mice studies, demonstrated that both TRAIL- and TRAIL-CD28–armored CAR-T cells induced superior tumor clearance compared to unarmored CAR-T cells. Conclusion: TRAIL and TRAIL-CD28 armoring significantly enhances anti-BCMA CAR-T cell efficacy, especially in resistant MM models, through death receptor-mediated tumor killing and CD28-driven survival signaling. These constructs demonstrate activity, supporting their development as next-generation CAR-T therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicCAR-T cell therapy research→French-language works237,207→