MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417014232 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-2470

Clinically meaningful improvement of the modified lee symptom score in patients treated with belumosudil for steroid-refractory chronic GVHD: Evidence from Canadian real-world outcomes

2025· article· en· W4417014232 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sergio Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Nihar Desai, Brittany Salter, Amani Ahmed, Mohamed Elemary, Jonas Mattsson, Kylie Lepic, Jennifer White, Dennis Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
Canadian institutionsSaskatchewan Cancer AgencyUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoHamilton Health SciencesPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClinical trialSwallowingQuality of life (healthcare)DiseaseConfidence intervalClinical endpointStandard score

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Belumosudil (BEL), a selective Rho-associated coiled-coil kinase 2 (ROCK2) inhibitor, has shown clinical efficacy in the management of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD), particularly in reversing fibrosis. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly recognized as valuable tools for assessing treatment response in cGvHD, such as the modified Lee Symptom Score (mLSS) serving as a practical tool for evaluating symptom burden. The current study aims to assess the clinical activity of BEL based on the symptom burden longitudinally measured by the mLSS in cGvHD patients treated with BEL after multiple prior therapy failures. Patients and methods This retrospective, multicentre study evaluated clinical outcomes and longitudinal improvement in mLSS following BEL therapy in patients with cGVHD who had failed multiple lines of therapy. We included 87 patientswho started BEL therapy between March 2023 and June 2024 and had the mLSS assessed as a standard of care. The 7-domain mLSS (skin, eye/mouth, breathing, eating/digestion, muscle/joints, energy, mental/emotional health) was assessed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months after the initiation of BEL. The sum of these domains was calculated to derive the total mLSS. A fibrotic sum score (FSS) was invented, calculated by summing the scores for limited joint movement, difficulty swallowing solids and liquids, and thickened skin, representing cGvHD manifestation of fibrosis. Clinically meaningful improvement (CMI) was defined as a reduction of ≥7 points in mLSS, ≥2 points in the FSS, and ≥ 1 point in each domain. Longitudinal changes in overall mLSS, FSS, and the sum of mLSS in each domain were analyzed using repeated measures with a general linear model (GLM), as well as the proportion of patients showing clinically meaningful improvement (CMI). Results A total of 87 patients with cGVHD were treated with BEL and had mLSS data available. At the time of starting BEL, 68% (n=59) patients had severe grade cGvHD, with a median of 3 (1-7) affected organs, and had received a median of 4 (2-10) prior lines of therapy. Most patients (82%, n=69/84) started BEL at 200 mg daily. With a median follow-up duration of 15.8 months among survivors (range 1–27) after BEL, the 6- and 12-month FFS rates were 82.3% (95% CI [71.9–89.2]) and 72.2% [60.0–81.3], respectively. The mLSS scores showed gradual decline pattern over time: 25.9 ± 1.6 (mean±SE; n=87), 19.0±1.8 (n=59), 16.7±2.3 (n=34), and 16.9±2.7 (n=20) at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months (p<0.001 by repeated measures using GLM). Compared to the baseline, the mLSS was reduced by 4.4 ± 0.9, 6.1 ± 1.5, and 8.3 ± 2.2 at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The proportion of patients who achieved a CMI-mLSS at 3, 6, and 12 months was 46% (n=27/59), 53% (n=18/34), and 65% (n=13/20); when analyzed for the best improvement, 62% (n=37/60) of the patients showed a CMI-mLSS. When comparing both the continuous mLSS and the proportion of CMI-mLSS to overall response rate and clinical benefit, the only difference was found in patients with a CMI-mLSS at 6 months (76%, n=13/17), who had a higher clinical benefit rate compared to those without a CMI-mLSS (33%, n=5/15; p=0.031). Similarly, the mean FSS scores were 4.2±0.4 (n=48), 2.4±0.5 (n=25), 2.4±0.7 (n=14), and 2.3±0.9 (n=8) at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, suggesting a significant reduction of fibrotic component of cGvHD over time with BEL therapy (p<0.001 by GLM). The proportion of patients who achieved a CMI-FSS at 3, 6, and 12 months was 20% (n=5/25), 43% (n=6/14), and 62% (n=5/8). When analyzed for the best improvement within 12 months of BEL treatment, 31% (n=8/26) showed a CMI-FSS. Except for the eating/digestion domain (15%), a minimum of 30% of patients demonstrated a CMI in each domain; the highest CMI was reported in muscle/joints (58%), followed by eye/mouth (54%), skin (50%), breathing (42%), energy (38%), and mental/emotional health (31%). Conclusion Our study reports a significant improvement in symptom burden with BEL therapy, as measured by the mLSS, over time. While it is challenging to observe objective response in fibrotic component of cGvHD only by NIH consensus criteria, the mLSS is a feasible and practical tool for capturing early clinical improvement, esp. fibrotic component, following BEL treatment, This highlights the importance of longitudinal monitoring of the mLSS and the urgent need for a reliable tool to assess symptom burden improvement with novel cGVHD therapies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.101

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicRheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies→French-language works237,207→