MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417015484 · doi:10.5376/lgg.2025.16.0018

Genetic Dissection of Isoflavone Content in Soybean Seeds

2025· article· W4417015484 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xingzhu Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueLegume Genomics and Genetics · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoybean genetics and cultivation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuantitative trait locusGeneGenotypeGenisteinGenetic diversityPhytoestrogensIsoflavonesGenetic architecturePhenomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Isoflavones, a class of phytoestrogens abundant in soybean seeds, are recognized for their nutritional and functional roles in human health and plant physiology. This study synthesizes current knowledge on the genetic dissection of isoflavone content in soybean seeds, integrating evidence from natural variation studies, pathway dissection, and molecular engineering. We summarize the biosynthetic pathway and core genes controlling isoflavone accumulation, highlight quantitative trait loci and haplotype diversity uncovered by QTL mapping and GWAS, and discuss how polygenic architecture and regulatory networks shape seed-specific accumulation. Insights from multi-omics approaches are integrated with evidence on environmental and developmental modulation, providing a comprehensive view of genotype × environment interactions. A case study demonstrates how GWAS-guided discovery and validation have led to the development of high-isoflavone soybean lines, illustrating translational potential. Finally, we explore breeding and biotechnological strategies, including marker-assisted selection, genomic prediction, gene editing, and haplotype-aware breeding, alongside challenges in phenotyping, resource development, and data integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.756

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLegume Genomics and GeneticsSame topicSoybean genetics and cultivationFrench-language works237,207