MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417017894 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-701

Safety and efficacy of talquetamab + teclistamab in patients with Relapsed/Refractory multiple myeloma from Phase 1b of redirectt-1: Results with an extended median follow-up of 3 years

2025· article· en· W4417017894 on OpenAlexaff
María‐Victoria Mateos, Hila Magen, Moshe E. Gatt, Michaël Sébag, Kihyun Kım, Chang‐Ki Min, Enrique M. Ocio, Sung-Soo Yoon, Michael Chu, Paula Rodríguez‐Otero, Irit Avivi, Natalia Quijano Cardé, Maria Krevvata, Todd Henninger, Payal Thakkar, M Festa, Lin Huang, Jiangxiu Zhou, Mikihiro Takamoto, Lixia Pei, Jiashen Lu, Carmela Maffucci, Emma Scott, Albert Oriol, Daniel Morillo, Yaël C. Cohen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsAlberta HealthAlberta Health ServicesMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiple myelomaPhases of clinical researchRegimenSafety profileAdverse effectPlasmacytomaProgressive disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Talquetamab (Tal, anti-GPRC5D×CD3) and teclistamab (Tec, anti-BCMA×CD3) are the first bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved as monotherapies for triple-class exposed (TCE) relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). In previous results from the phase 1b portion of RedirecTT-1 (NCT04586426, March 2024 data cut; median follow-up [mFU] 20.3 mo), Tal + Tec elicited deep, durable responses and demonstrated a safety profile generally consistent with each monotherapy across all dose levels (DLs), including at the recommended phase 2 regimen (RP2R) of Tal 0.8 mg/kg + Tec 3.0 mg/kg Q2W and in patients (pts) with true extramedullary disease (EMD). We report efficacy and ongoing safety from phase 1b of RedirecTT-1 at an extended mFU of 36.2 mo. Methods: Pts had TCE RRMM with measurable disease per IMWG criteria and were refractory, relapsed, or intolerant to the last line of therapy. True EMD was defined as ≥1 nonradiated soft tissue plasmacytoma noncontiguous with bone ≥2 cm in 1 dimension (with or without paramedullary plasmacytomas). Primary objectives were to evaluate safety and identify a RP2R. Investigator-assessed confirmed response per IMWG criteria was reported in all treated pts. EMD response was assessed by CT, PET-CT, or MRI whole-body scans. Results: As of July 2025, 94 pts received Tal + Tec (44 pts at the RP2R), with a mFU of 36.2 mo (34.1 mo at the RP2R). Baseline characteristics were as previously reported; 23 (45.1%) pts had high-risk cytogenetics. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 3 pts across non-RP2R DLs (all grade [gr] 3; oral herpes, oral candidiasis, increased alanine/aspartate aminotransferase) and in 1 pt at the RP2R (gr 4 thrombocytopenia). Most common adverse events (AEs) were CRS (80.9%; gr 3, 2.1%; no gr 4/5), neutropenia (74.5%; gr 3/4, 70.2%), taste changes (66.0%; all gr 1/2), and non-rash skin AEs (62.8%; gr 3, 2.1%). Infections occurred in 93.6% of pts (gr 3/4, 68.1% [54.5% at the RP2R]). The most common infection was COVID-19 (40.4%; gr 3/4, 17.0%); pts were screened for enrolment between 2020–2023, concurrent with the COVID-19 pandemic. Opportunistic infections occurred in 16 (17.0%) pts. Eighty-four (89.4%) pts had posttreatment hypogammaglobulinemia; 61 (64.9%) pts received ≥1 dose of IgG. ICANS occurred in 3.2% of pts (gr 3/4, 1.1%). Overall, 18 (19.4%) pts discontinued Tal + Tec due to AEs (6 [14.0%] at the RP2R), of which 9 were deemed drug-related by investigator (2 at the RP2R); 12 discontinuations were due to infections (5 at the RP2R). One pt discontinued Tal only. In total, 18 (19.1%) pts died due to AEs (6 [13.6%] at the RP2R), of which 9 (9.6%) were deemed drug-related by investigator (2 [4.5%] at the RP2R). At the RP2R, overall response rate (ORR) was 79.5%, with a ≥CR rate of 61.4%; ORR was 61.1% (≥CR, 44.4%) in pts with EMD and 92.3% (≥CR, 73.1%) in pts without EMD. Across all DLs, ORR was 77.7% (≥CR, 52.1%). Responses continued to be durable at the RP2R and across all DLs, including in pts with EMD, consistent with previous results. The median duration of response (DOR) was non-estimable (NE) at the RP2R (NE with and without EMD), as well as across all DLs, with 36-mo DOR rates of 71.1% at the RP2R (61.4% with EMD, 76.4% without EMD) and 58.5% across all DLs. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were promising at an extended mFU. Median PFS was NE at the RP2R (21.6 mo with EMD, NE without EMD) and 38.6 mo across all DLs, with 36-mo PFS rates of 57.9% at the RP2R (39.7% with EMD, 70.5% without EMD) and 52.6% across all DLs. Median OS was NE at the RP2R (NE with and without EMD), as well as across all DLs, with 36-mo OS rates of 73.9% at the RP2R (57.0% with EMD, 83.2% without EMD) and 65.8% across all DLs. Conclusions: At an extended mFU of ~3 yrs, Tal + Tec continued to have a safety profile that was generally consistent with each monotherapy, with no exacerbation of AEs with the combination. The infection profile supported prophylaxis and vigilant monitoring and management. Tal + Tec led to a high ORR and deep, durable responses in all pts, including at the RP2R and in pts with true EMD, contributing to durable PFS observed across all pts. DOR and prolonged survival in pts with and without EMD exceeded all therapies for pts with TCE RRMM. These data continue to highlight the clinical benefit of the novel combination of Tal + Tec in pts with TCE RRMM, validating the RP2R and the ongoing phase 2 analyses in pts with true EMD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→