MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417018218 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-3998

Tracking peripheral residual disease in myeloma: Clonotypic sequencing and mass spectrometry in the teclistamab era

2025· article· en· W4417018218 on OpenAlexaffabout
Anna Sabouret, Gaspard Jadot, Rafik Terra, Richard LeBlanc, Jean Roy, Stéphanie Thiant, Jean‐Sébastien Claveau

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonoclonalMinimal residual diseaseMonoclonal antibodyImmunofixationSerum protein electrophoresisclone (Java method)Selected reaction monitoringMultiple myeloma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable hematological cancer and is characterized by the proliferation of a plasma cell clone secreting a monoclonal protein. Teclistamab, a BCMA-directed bispecific antibody, has demonstrated improved outcomes in relapsed and refractory MM in the MajesTEC-1 trial. Standard serum electrophoretic methods, such as serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP) and immunofixation (IFE), lack the analytical sensitivity to detect low level of residual monoclonal immunoglobulins, limiting their utility for measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment. Two emerging mass spectrometry-based techniques are revolutionizing the detection and quantification of monoclonal immunoglobulins : the intact immunoglobulin mass spectrometry (MS) and the clonotypic assay (EssayM). This study aimed to assess the performance of MS and EasyM for disease monitoring and early relapse detection in patients treated with teclistamab. Methods In this retrospective study conducted between December 2024 and July 2025, we assessed all consecutive RRMM patients with relapsed MM receiving teclistamab. Inclusion was limited to patients with measurable disease as determined by mass spectrometry-based assays. Serial monitoring with MS was performed monthly, while a clonotypic assessment using EasyM was conducted at baseline and every 2 months thereafter. In parallel, MRD was evaluated by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF) performed at the time MS negativity was documented, according to the Euroflow protocol (sensitivity 10-5). Monoclonal protein detection and quantification via MS was carried out using MALDI-TOF, with analytical validation based on the reference assay established by Mayo Clinic (Mass-Fix). EasyM, a peripheral clonotypic assay (Rapid Novor, Canada), involves de novo amino acid sequencing of the full-length M-protein and quantification of unique peptides with parallel reaction monitoring. Results We retrospectively evaluated 23 RRMM patients, with a median age of 72 years (range 31-91). High-risk cytogenetics were identified in 33%, and 37% presented with extramedullary disease at the initiation of teclistamab therapy. Patients received a median of 3 prior lines of treatment (range 1-8) and all patients were triple-class refractory. Sequencing success rate for EasyM was 92% (n=23/25). The two patients that were not sequenced had no detectable monoclonal protein and were excluded from this study. Best responses based on IMWG criteria were complete response (CR) in 8 patients, very-good partial response (VGPR) in 7 patients, and partial response (PR) in 5 patients. With a median follow-up of 11 months and the median PFS was 172 days. Notably, patients achieving sustained MS negativity demonstrated a 1-year PFS of 100% compared to 58% among those who remained MS positive. Eight patients achieved MS negativity. Among them, 3 also became negative by EasyM, whereas the remaining 5 retained detectable residual clones, with a median of 2.64% residual clone (range 1.17 -13.42%). Similarly, patients achieving CR showed a median residual clonal population of 1.93% (range 0.0-13.42%), despite being uniformly negative by MS. In patients who experienced progressive disease (n=3), a sharp increase in clonal burden was detected by EasyM within the first month of relapse, with a median residual clone level of 138% (range 105-632%). Notably, both SPEP and MS remained below the conventional 25% threshold for biochemical progression during this early relapse period. Regarding bone marrow MRD evaluation, 3 patients achieved concordant negativity by both NGF and EasyM. However, in 5 patients, MRD negativity was discordant with persistent clonal detection by EasyM, indicating residual disease at the molecular level despite immunophenotypic bone marrow clearance. Conclusion The clonotypic mass spectrometry assay (EasyM) demonstrated its ability to detect residual clonal disease undetected by conventional methods such as SPEP, MS and even bone marrow NGF MRD assessment. To our knowledge, this is the first study integrating bispecific antibody therapy with high resolution mass spectrometry profiling for response monitoring in MM. These findings suggest that EasyM is highly sensitive to detect residual monoclonal protein, highlighting its potential to improve monitoring and response assessment in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma receiving with teclistamab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→French-language works237,207→