A comparative cohort study of epilepsy in children in Greenland and Denmark
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Few studies on epilepsy in Greenlandic children exist, and the results are inconsistent. The objective of this study was to estimate the burden of epilepsy in children in Greenland and Denmark and secondly to identify demographic risk factors. Third, the risk of epilepsy after febrile seizures should be estimated. A register-based cohort study of all children in Greenland and Denmark aged 0-15 years from 1987 to 2014 was conducted. Using the Greenlandic and Danish National Patient Register, cases were identified and coupled to demographics through the Civil Registration System. The outcomes were incidence rates (IR) per 100,000 person-years (PY) and hazard ratios (HR).The study showed an epilepsy IR of 150/100,000 PY (139-162) in Greenland and 110/100,000PY (108-111) in Denmark and an HR of 1.34. The IRs were very high in the first years of life. A significantly higher HR was found for male sex, Inuit ethnicity in Greenland and habitation in Greenland outside of the capital. The risk of epilepsy after the diagnosis of febrile seizures was almost doubled in Greenland compared with Denmark.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".