MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417018967 · doi:10.1182/blood-2025-1860

Favorable safety and efficacy in a phase II trial using duvelisib maintenance after autologous stem cell transplant in T-cell and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas

2025· article· en· W4417018967 on OpenAlexaff
Hunter Cochran, Raya Saba, Ningying Wu, Neha Mehta–Shah, Armin Ghobadi, John F. DiPersio, Amanda F. Cashen

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCanadian Cancer Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaintenance therapyLymphomaPhases of clinical researchClinical trialAdverse effectDosingStem cellSafety profile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare, aggressive group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), including PTCL-not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). For patients who achieve remission, autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is the standard consolidative approach. However, relapse remains common, and no post-ASCT maintenance therapies are currently approved. In the NLG-T-01 study, the 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) following upfront ASCT was 44%, and overall survival (OS) was 51%, underscoring the need for strategies to prolong remission in this high-risk population. Duvelisib, an oral dual PI3K-δ/γ inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical activity in relapsed/refractory PTCL. In the PRIMO study, duvelisib achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 48% and complete response rate (CRR) of 33%, with a manageable safety profile using a dose-optimized approach. Given its clinical activity across PTCL subtypes and manageable toxicity, we hypothesized that maintenance therapy with low-dose duvelisib following ASCT could improve PFS. We conducted a study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of post-transplant duvelisib maintenance in patients with PTCL. Methods This single-center, phase II trial enrolled duvelisib-naive patients with TCL or B-NHL who underwent consolidative ASCT. Following a safety lead-in, enrollment was limited to TCL. Duvelisib maintenance began after hematologic recovery (day +30) and continued for up to 11 cycles. Due to tolerability, the initial dosing (25 mg BID, days 1–28) was amended after 7 patients with a modified schedule (25 mg BID, days 1–14 of a 28-day cycle). Response assessment scans occurred at the end of cycle 2 and subsequently every 3 cycles. Those with stable (SD) or progressive disease (PD) were taken off study. All patients received PJP and herpesvirus prophylaxis. Results Seventeen patients were enrolled from July 2020 to July 2024. Histologic subtypes included PTCL-NOS (n = 6), ALCL (n = 4), AITL (n = 2), and transformed follicular lymphoma (tFL, n = 5). Ten patients were male; the median age at ASCT was 59 years (range, 24–69). Twelve patients had stage III/IV disease at diagnosis. Pre-transplant responses included 16 in complete remission (CR) and 1 in partial remission (PR). Among the 12 patients with TCL, 11 (92%) were in first CR/PR and 1 was in CR2 at the time of transplant. The median treatment durations for Schedules 1 and 2 were 5.4 months (Interquartile Range [IQR], 2.8–11.1) and 11.3 months (IQR, 7.5–11.8), respectively, with median follow-up of 17.2 (IQR, 14.6–22.5) and 19.0 months (IQR, 8.7–23.3), respectively. All twelve patients with TCL were included in the efficacy analysis. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) (95% CI, 5.9–NR), and median overall survival (OS) was 35.6 months (95% CI, NR–NR). At 12 months, PFS and OS were 83.3% (95% CI, 48.2–95.6%) and 91.7% (95% CI, 53.9–98.8%), respectively. All 17 patients were included in the safety analysis. Three of 7 patients treated on Schedule 1 discontinued duvelisib due to toxicity: one grade 3 elevated liver enzymes, one grade 3 diarrhea, and one muscle weakness (unlikely related to duvelisib nor disease progression). This prompted a protocol amendment to Schedule 2, with subsequent improvement in tolerability. The most common adverse events (AEs) were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and hepatic. Grade 3 treatment-related AEs were observed in 9 patients, including febrile neutropenia (n = 1), lymphopenia (n = 3), diarrhea (n = 1), pneumonia (n = 1), and elevated liver enzymes (n = 3). There was one Grade 4 AE, lymphopenia, and no treatment-related deaths. Infectious events occurred in 7 patients, including thrush (n = 2), upper respiratory tract infections (n = 3), sinusitis (n = 1), and pneumonia (n = 1); none of these infections led to treatment holds or dose reductions. Four patients have relapsed (TCL, n = 2; tFL, n = 2), and 15 of 17 remain alive to date. Conclusion Duvelisib maintenance for up to one-year post-ASCT was safe and generally well tolerated, especially with the modified intermittent dosing schedule (25 mg BID, days 1–14 of a 28-day cycle). In patients with TCL, duvelisib maintenance yielded promising disease control and compares favorably to historical outcomes in this high-risk population. Given the promising results, a larger multicenter phase 3 trial is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→