MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417027921 · doi:10.1186/s13059-025-03879-x

Bamdam: a post-mapping authentication toolkit for ancient metagenomics

2025· article· en· W4417027921 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bianca De Sanctis, Cade Mirchandani, Haoran Dong, Ruairidh Macleod, Russell Corbett‐Detig, Yucheng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of California - President's Postdoctoral Fellowship ProgramNational Natural Science Foundation of China-China Academy of General Technology Joint Fund for Basic ResearchSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMetagenomicsPairwise comparisonShotgun sequencingSuiteAuthentication (law)AncestorMost recent common ancestorPhylogenetic tree

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ancient metagenomic studies using capture or shotgun sequencing often perform pairwise alignment of individual reads against large reference databases followed by lowest common ancestor assignment for taxonomic identification. Here, we present bamdam, a lightweight post-mapping, post lowest common ancestor toolkit for eukaryotic or microbial metagenomics. Bamdam can shrink large metagenomics bam files, often by a factor of 10x or more, while retaining all informative reads and alignments, compute a suite of authentication metrics for each taxonomic node including k-mer duplicity, postmortem damage, and mean read complexity, and generate various visualizations including multi-sample deamination plots and damage-colored interactive Krona plots.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome biologySame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207