MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417029014 · doi:10.1017/s0041977x25100980

Khotanese <i>dīñ</i> - “overthink” and Avestan <i>daēnā</i> - “view, vision”

2025· article· en· W4417029014 on OpenAlex
Doug Hitch, Mehrdad Derafshi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLinguistics and language evolution
Canadian institutionsArctic Borderlands Ecological Knowledge Society
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)VerbMeaning (existential)BuddhismCognateWord (group theory)Original meaning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Two new folios from the Old Khotanese epic Buddhist poem the Book of Zambasta have recently come to light. One folio contains the word dīñu which is thrice attested elsewhere in both Old ( dīñi, dīña ) and Late Khotanese ( dīñä ) and has been puzzling. The new attestation provides context which helps to establish the approximate meaning of the word. It also provides a new shape (- u ) which establishes the morphology. Most shapes (- u, -i, -ä ) attest a second singular imperative middle of dīñ - “to overthink”. This finding improves the translation of several passages. dīñ - appears to be a denominal verb from * dīnā - “thought”, cognate to Avestan daēnā - “view, vision” and related to Vedic dhī - “think, reflect”. The semantic development appears to be “see” → “think” → “overthink”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it