MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417031845 · doi:10.4324/9781003376248-11

France

2025· book-chapter· en· W4417031845 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sébastien Prat, Estébanine Moulia-Pelat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicDispute Resolution and Class Actions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAppealSupreme courtJuryCriminal justiceCornerstoneEconomic JusticeCriminal law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

France operates under both an inquisitorial system and a civil law system. The judicial system is a cornerstone of its democratic society, ensuring justice and the rule of law. The court system is organised hierarchically into three levels. At the base are the courts of first instance (tribunaux de première instance, renamed tribunaux judiciaires in 2020). These ordinary courts handle civil and criminal cases. For criminal matters, the tribunaux correctionnels handle misdemeanours, while the tribunaux de police deal with minor offences. The most serious crimes, such as murder, are tried in the cour d’assises, which includes a jury of citizens and a judge. Appeals from these courts are heard in a cour d’appel, and the highest level of appeal is the Cour de cassation, which functions similarly to the Supreme Court in Canada or the United States.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.654
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDispute Resolution and Class ActionsFrench-language works237,207