MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417035633 · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106028

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Snyder Dispositional Hope Scale and Adaptability Scale among Chinese EFL college students

2025· article· en· W4417035633 on OpenAlexaff
Ning Chen, Xia Zheng, Xiao-Ling Liao, Wenjia Li, I‐Hua Chen, Gordon L. Flett

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Psychologica · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicOptimism, Hope, and Well-being
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersKey Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Sichuan Province
KeywordsAdaptabilityScale (ratio)Reliability (semiconductor)Psychological interventionCognitionValidity

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Despite theoretical links between dispositional hope and adaptability in education and their respective roles as key orientations that facilitate learning, their measurement in English as Foreign Language (EFL) students remains relatively underexplored. Previous validations of Snyder's Dispositional Hope Scale (DHS) and Martin's Adaptability Scale (AS) have primarily relied upon classical test theory rather than more sophisticated methodologies. This study assessed the psychometric properties of the Chinese versions of these scales (CDHS and CAS) in EFL college students using Rasch analysis, exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), and network analysis. METHODS: A total of 485 EFL college students from 10 institutions across 12 Chinese provinces were recruited through convenience sampling. The study employed a comprehensive analytical approach to evaluate both model-level and item-level psychometric properties of the CDHS and CAS. RESULTS: (1) The analyses established a unidimensional structure for the CDHS and a two-factor ESEM structure for the CAS, both demonstrating adequate factorial validity and internal consistency. This differs in part from the factor structure of the original version of the scale. (2) Rasch analysis revealed item redundancy and mid-trait clustering, suggesting opportunities for scale optimization. (3) Structural equation modeling highlighted significant positive associations between hope and both cognitive-behavioral and affective dimensions of adaptability, with the affective factor showing a stronger relationship. (4) Network analysis further underscored the central role of adaptability items in bridging constructs, particularly cognitive flexibility, resource-seeking, and emotional positivity items. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide robust evidence for the validity and reliability of the CDHS and CAS in assessing hope and adaptability among Chinese EFL students. These findings offer insights for developing targeted psychological interventions to support EFL learners navigating the cognitive and emotional challenges of language acquisition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa PsychologicaSame topicOptimism, Hope, and Well-beingFrench-language works237,207