MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4417040428 · doi:10.2196/83151

Investigating the Role of the Environment on Physical Activity Interventions (the InSPACE Project): Protocol for a Pooled Secondary Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2025· article· en· W4417040428 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amy J. Youngbloom, Maya G Rowland, Stephen J. Mooney, Adam A. Szpiro, Brian E. Saelens

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhysical Activity and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProtocol (science)Psychological interventionRandomized controlled trialPhysical activityMeta-analysisData collectionHarmonizationIntervention (counseling)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Physical activity (PA) interventions can increase levels of PA to help participants meet recommended levels. The impact of PA interventions may be affected by an individual's neighborhood environment, including attributes such as walkability, crime rates, or greenspace availability, but research to date has lacked the power and geographic spread to adequately assess the role of the environment. Objective: The Interventions Supporting Physical Activity and the Environment (InSPACE) study used the Automatic Context Measurement Tool (ACMT) to gather environmental measures for participants around their home address in completed lifestyle intervention trials across the United States, then pooled and harmonized demographic and device-based activity data, creating a dataset for use in assessing the moderation effect of neighborhood attributes on interventions to increase PA. Methods: PA intervention trials were recruited from across the United States, and trialists were instructed in the use of the ACMT to geocode and collect prespecified environmental measures. The InSPACE research team gathered deidentified data from trialists, including demographics, raw accelerometry data, and ACMT-generated environmental measures and harmonized data to create a pooled dataset of PA intervention trial participants. Results: As of August 2025, a total of 39 PA intervention trials have been recruited and data from 31 of these trials have been processed and harmonized, creating a current pooled dataset of 4471 participants with any harmonized data, of whom 4360 (97.5%) have linked environmental data and 2208 (49.4%) have specified (3 days of at least 8 hours per day) accelerometry data for both baseline and postintervention. Results from the primary analysis for the InSPACE project are expected to be published in late 2026. Conclusions: InSPACE will contribute to understanding the role of the environment in moderating the effect of interventions to increase PA. The protocols and processes of InSPACE can inform future projects in pooled data harmonization and analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.117
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.152
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.117
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1170.152
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0090.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.014
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.006
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0100.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1030.025

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.312
GPT teacher head0.597
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicPhysical Activity and Health→French-language works237,207→