MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4417042941 · doi:10.1093/ageing/afaf318.026

From Silence to Surge: Nursing Home Research in Ireland Before and After the Pandemic

2025· article· en· W4417042941 on OpenAlexaff
Patrick Doyle, Sinéad McHugh, Desmond O’Neill

Bibliographic record

VenueAge and Ageing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcknowledgementIrishPandemicNursing homesNursing researchWorkforceDescriptive researchSilence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Nursing home residents in Ireland experienced a disproportionate burden of illness and death during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting longstanding systemic deficiencies in governance, staffing, and research engagement. Prior to the pandemic, this vulnerable population, characterised by high levels of multimorbidity and disability, received limited research attention. A subgroup from the National Clinical Programme for Older People recommended the development of a research agenda in nursing homes, including resident involvement. This study aimed to characterise the extent and nature of Irish nursing home research from 1966 to 2024. Methods A bibliometric review was conducted using PubMed to identify publications related to Irish nursing homes from January 1966 to March 2020 (pre-pandemic) and April 2020 to July 2024 (post-pandemic). Data extracted included publication type, number of authors, institutional affiliations, countries of origin, disciplines involved, and acknowledgement of nursing home staff or residents. Descriptive analysis was performed using Excel and SPSS. Results A total of 144 publications were identified. Most papers (n=106; 73.6%) were published pre-pandemic, while 38 (26.4%) appeared in the shorter post-pandemic period, showing a substantial increase in publication rate (1.9 to 9.5/year). Original research comprised 81.3% of papers. Interdisciplinary authorship was common, yet only 12.5% of papers listed a nursing home as an author affiliation—primarily from public or voluntary sectors. Less than 40% of papers acknowledged staff or resident contributions. While COVID-19-focused publications increased markedly post-2020, broader topics in nursing home care remained underrepresented. Conclusion Despite increased research activity during the pandemic, engagement with nursing home research in Ireland remains limited, especially from the private sector. The lack of consistent stakeholder involvement and sustained research investment signals a need for a national strategy. Key priorities include implementing the interRAI tool, improving professional engagement, and enhancing research funding to ensure evidence-based policy and care for nursing home residents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.404

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAge and AgeingSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207